Return-Path: <xma@gnu.org>
X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8570D41A550
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 14:20:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.463
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.463 tagged_above=-999 required=5
	tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.363, TO_NO_BRKTS_DYNIP=1]
	autolearn=disabled
Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id LZGBrsCm22D7 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
	Wed, 24 Nov 2010 14:20:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from xhlj.maillard.im (cha51-3-88-164-105-66.fbx.proxad.net
	[88.164.105.66])
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDCB5431FB5
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 14:20:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from xhlj.maillard.im (xhlj.maillard.im [127.0.0.1])
	by xhlj.maillard.im (Postfix) with ESMTP id 392ED20384
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 23:20:46 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=maillard.im; h=from:to
	:subject:reply-to:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s=
	postfix; bh=broZt7Lqu3D8nCokpXYxuM9dghs=; b=i8VotkeymFrJLxRj3SqB
	VNJ4+4FQWx5J4oafl6pWtvIknBFBKEs+Osh6en7SJ444mm03uzXAn5oN/P0qkmqF
	4VAIR1wR9z7W3BrTA93Zg/yTf+Md01p8hRMOHIX610B6IykacNFzHbMpSXmJNRBC
	76ZGbELfD5RJto6ni7KohJM=
Received: from maillard.im (unknown [192.168.0.254])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by xhlj.maillard.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 23:20:46 +0100 (CET)
From: Xavier Maillard <xma@gnu.org>
To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Subject: [FEATURE REQUEST]: post-processing on notmuch new
User-Agent: Notmuch/0.5 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.2.1
	(i486-slackware-linux-gnu)
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 23:27:45 +0100
Message-ID: <m28w0i2w7y.fsf@kcals.maillard.im>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Xavier Maillard <xma@gnu.org>
List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
	<notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 22:20:48 -0000

Hi,

Am I alone thinking it could be cool to specify a post-processing script
to run after 'notmuch new' ?

Currently, one can tell notmuch to add a unique tag but I guess we could
extend this to something much smarter. I guess I am not alone using a
tagging script after each refresh.

What do you think ?

-- Xavier