Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF7EE431FD0 for ; Tue, 1 Nov 2011 07:29:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.29 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.29 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RkbCsvzq7UCm for ; Tue, 1 Nov 2011 07:29:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tempo.its.unb.ca (tempo.its.unb.ca [131.202.1.21]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9576C431FB6 for ; Tue, 1 Nov 2011 07:29:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zancas.localnet (fctnnbsc36w-156034064058.pppoe-dynamic.High-Speed.nb.bellaliant.net [156.34.64.58]) (authenticated bits=0) by tempo.its.unb.ca (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id pA1ESuRJ013269 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 1 Nov 2011 11:28:59 -0300 Received: from bremner by zancas.localnet with local (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1RLFKi-0006BC-0k; Tue, 01 Nov 2011 11:28:56 -0300 From: David Bremner To: Daniel Schoepe , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: Patch review/application process In-Reply-To: <878vo8kdl2.fsf@gilead.invalid> References: <878vo8kdl2.fsf@gilead.invalid> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.9+26~g4e49596 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2011 11:28:45 -0300 Message-ID: <87hb2n7w82.fsf@zancas.localnet> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2011 14:29:02 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 25 Oct 2011 22:42:33 +0200, Daniel Schoepe wro= te: >. There is also a number of patches that have been reviewed by > long-term contributors, but are then seemingly forgotten (I can find > some concrete examples of this, if this claim is in doubt). Maybe you can tag those patches as "notmuch::reviewed" using nmbug? [1] My idea is that=20 notmuch search tag:notmuch::patch and tag:notmuch::reviewed should give a kind of consensus set of "ready to go" patch sets. Don't worry about if I or someone else disagrees with your assessment, we can always untag it, and leave a comment in the commit log. [2]=20=20 There are also plenty of patches that are not reviewed at all. I'm not defending the state of patch integration, but I think we could use some more reviews as well. d [1]: http://notmuchmail.org/nmbug/ [2]: nmbug log $id could be defined as something like "cd $HOME/.nmbug && g= it log -- tags/$(echo $id | sha1sum -)" --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iJwEAQECAAYFAk6wAh0ACgkQTiiN/0Um85lvywP+IP1DRhhIz7DOaiX1E21kJrx/ 11R3oHGqZwOx5uHYFHSIXILlNUycRdDl/lJwKoC6R1KtFF7SklXYPd4MIXVySA22 V5f/LjIuaEa1JnzDKQExhhDbbrtj2FpM6H5cZw8YRrOsQYQt/2dA5xcFsJdIUyj0 RDnfJdYGzy028T4AMcw= =W1yo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--