Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38CB1431FAF for ; Sat, 2 Nov 2013 05:16:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UtSCIEqnsU+x for ; Sat, 2 Nov 2013 05:16:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from yantan.tethera.net (yantan.tethera.net [199.188.72.155]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47768431FAE for ; Sat, 2 Nov 2013 05:16:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from remotemail by yantan.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Vca7j-0005iq-MB; Sat, 02 Nov 2013 09:16:15 -0300 Received: (nullmailer pid 14804 invoked by uid 1000); Sat, 02 Nov 2013 12:16:12 -0000 From: David Bremner To: Jani Nikula Subject: Re: [PATCH] lib: update documentation of callback functions for database_compact and database_upgrade. In-Reply-To: References: <2a58adbdc1257f16579692544b4bcbadca3d3045.1383315568.git.jani@nikula.org> <1383347716-5375-1-git-send-email-david@tethera.net> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.16+111~ga7964c8 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2013 09:16:12 -0300 Message-ID: <87iowbroc3.fsf@zancas.localnet> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: Notmuch Mail X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2013 12:16:20 -0000 Jani Nikula writes: > The point was, we can do this *now* without soname bumps, because we > haven't released this yet. OK, I think we are agreeing violently. This is a bit ephemeral for a commit message, but not worth re-doing the patch just for that. d