Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0E5A6DE1413 for ; Mon, 3 Aug 2015 01:27:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.144 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.144 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.144] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nvmx3Bbcviou for ; Mon, 3 Aug 2015 01:27:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gitolite.debian.net (gitolite.debian.net [87.98.215.224]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D0AC6DE1410 for ; Mon, 3 Aug 2015 01:27:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from remotemail by gitolite.debian.net with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZMB4L-0004wu-Kb; Mon, 03 Aug 2015 08:26:01 +0000 Received: (nullmailer pid 15988 invoked by uid 1000); Mon, 03 Aug 2015 08:25:46 -0000 From: David Bremner To: Mark Walters , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] emacs: make modifications to message Fcc vars buffer-local In-Reply-To: <873800yfuq.fsf@qmul.ac.uk> References: <87vbdrysd7.fsf@qmul.ac.uk> <1438422296-29087-1-git-send-email-david@tethera.net> <1438422296-29087-3-git-send-email-david@tethera.net> <873800yfuq.fsf@qmul.ac.uk> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.20.2 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.5.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2015 10:25:46 +0200 Message-ID: <87fv4093sl.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2015 08:27:31 -0000 Mark Walters writes: > > Do you mean the buffer name is *mail*? We could just call rename-buffer > somewhere (maybe in our derived mode bit?) The mode-line says "notmuch-compose", but the menu is called "Message". Maybe we should call the mode "notmuch-message" and write "Notmuch Message" in the mode line. You know what Tomi always says about naming things ;). > > A related case, which we probably should fix, is that C-c C-s is bound to > message send (and don't exit), this probably needs a wrapper too That's a good point, and should probably even be done in the initial merged patch series.