Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81948431FAF for ; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 13:02:47 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.01 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.01 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3j9sO+P-P79t for ; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 13:02:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from rshg051.localdomain (rshg051.dnsready.net [174.142.147.194]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF0C3431FAE for ; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 13:02:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from kiwwwi.com.ar (unknown [186.60.157.116]) by rshg051.localdomain (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D06943518B9E for ; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 18:02:45 -0300 (ART) From: =?utf-8?Q?Nicol=C3=A1s?= Reynolds To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Cc: Subject: Re: [RFC] Smart replying In-Reply-To: <87hay8xdoe.fsf@jhu.edu> References: <87hay8xdoe.fsf@jhu.edu> User-Agent: Notmuch/ (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.4.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2012 18:02:09 -0300 Message-ID: <8762eom3vy.fsf@kiwwwi.com.ar> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2012 21:02:47 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 01 Mar 2012 15:35:13 -0500, Jesse Rosenthal wr= ote: > Dear All, >=20 > I know that folks recently got done haggling over reply bindings, but > there's something I've been using for a little while, and I was curious > about whether it's something people would be interested in. Forgive me > if this functionality was already discussed and I missed it. >=20 > The problem is that I often forget to reply-all to list mails and write > out half a message, and then have to cut and paste. So, as usual, my > solution is to try and have emacs figure it out for me. >=20 > Pretty simple: have a variable `reply-all-list'. If an address in the > `To' or `CC' fields is in that list, 'r' replies-all. If not, it > replies-sender. CTRL-r (or whatever) forces `reply-sender', on the rare > occasion I want to take a conversation offline. >=20 > The nice thing about this is, if `reply-all-list' is nil, then it acts > as normal, so it wouldn't make a difference to most users. >=20 > The implementation that's been sitting in my .emacs is below. I'm not > offering it as a patch, because I don't quite understand the current > relation of notmuch-show.el and notmuch-mua.el.=20 >=20 > If people are interested, though, I could make it into a patch. And, if > not, I hope it's a snippet that someone finds useful. I'll try it, it's been bothering me also on reply-to-list lists :) (There's also C-c C-l but it doesn't work for me) --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJPT+PRAAoJEEVgMtcXpM2cLXgIAK4KsZyNXmfLKRSFsjsoBMok PyJv9tJ5uwFW1IU5r3K1o/ErBSm4zsCMcZx9DOM45neLdVCA6Vf8as4eWOfHyxLn Plo+Ba79zGoxNqrwnZhEJpXzLUC7a0xKOw5A3hDpxYdu2f2yxz4L/iKvJKqKJtWd CmY98JGlph9twP03+XH53NDDyqCSUpUllhCYOt3njM/7fOpLal8LaMt3yB718tYU fBm4pJRxJwXZHPlbr+oqZXd1jtxZ6LXITYubrShtob9ocSJR/MMHWb7lG/Fq++GI JdqiGS7BrZANSajVz4vkVKKYPI5lTqr81B8D07Pf5Ea2b+odMqQ6HQGPyQDGk+0= =E7Lo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--