To: Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>,
 notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] test: Add tests for advance/rewind.
In-Reply-To: <874nw83gg5.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>
References: <1324665712-2419-1-git-send-email-dme@dme.org>
	<1325160490-23472-1-git-send-email-dme@dme.org>
	<1325160490-23472-2-git-send-email-dme@dme.org>
	<cunmxabqs6k.fsf@hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net>
	<874nw83gg5.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>
User-Agent: Notmuch/0.10.2+151~gbf1dc2b (http://notmuchmail.org)
	Emacs/24.0.92.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
From: David Edmondson <dme@dme.org>
Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2012 17:31:53 +0000
Message-ID: <cun4nw83fg6.fsf@hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
	micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Precedence: list

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, 06 Jan 2012 09:10:17 -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestr=
ucture.net> wrote:
> > It makes it simpler to develop and maintain the test (because you can do
> > more work with traditional emacs support for editing elisp), but might
> > make interpreting failures more difficult (the test harness mostly just
> > reports 'failed').
>=20
> It is really nice to see diffs on failure, actually, to get a sense of
> what exactly went wrong.

Agreed.

> Is it possible to have some sort of standard report to stdout that
> could provide more info?

A little syntactic sugar will improve things I expect (have to avoid
re-implementing ert though). I'll have a play.

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAk8HMAkACgkQaezQq/BJZRYsxQCggRHWLuUotclMXaWahgeo/B6L
tNUAn1RdpQY9Te/ZuxPIKD893EsDGhhv
=+LWu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--