DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date
	:message-id:mime-version:content-type;
	b=pqQFKNvgZFrDykAAvC6K0goi6d3h+/n4Ly1Mj9G2iuHFEMlgVQtwRZ3dOyzZlbBH+N
	OR1QlYD2BeWWx3ma7APbBWIymXcxqrLv6biDjxb0t+7LCtMksyfYChN4XGWth1r4kWbx
	3JFAdrsZdeW5uxAkV3GUoxQOQVpxvubQMknJw=
From: Sebastien Binet <seb.binet@gmail.com>
To: Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org>,
	Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>
Subject: Re: bug in emacs-ui ?
In-Reply-To: <87oc1qet0v.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
References: <8739j5rn2d.fsf@cern.ch>
	<87pqm8cz4f.fsf@servo.factory.finestructure.net>
	<87oc1spkkc.fsf@cern.ch>
	<87mxhccw9v.fsf@servo.factory.finestructure.net>
	<87hb7kpi7e.fsf@cern.ch>
	<87fwn4cm9q.fsf@servo.factory.finestructure.net>
	<BANLkTin=viaP4US-=qj2x7BQOKhGaLeaHw@mail.gmail.com>
	<87hb7jg2rl.fsf@servo.factory.finestructure.net>
	<878vsv9eam.fsf@cern.ch> <87oc1qet0v.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
User-Agent: Notmuch/ (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1
	(x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 08:50:23 +0200
Message-ID: <87ei2m8imo.fsf@cern.ch>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
	micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Cc: , notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Precedence: list

--=-=-=
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 15:09:20 -0700, Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org> wrote:
Non-text part: multipart/signed
> On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 21:26:25 +0200, Sebastien Binet <seb.binet@gmail.com>=
 wrote:
> > fyi: I am using emacs-23.3
>=20
> Perhaps this is an emacs bug?
could be, but,

> I'm using Debian's emacs 23.3.1 and have not encountered the problem
> described.
I don't see anything related to 'point', 'point-invisible-p' nor 'forward-c=
har' in there:
http://patch-tracker.debian.org/package/emacs23/23.3+1-1

anyways... for the moment I'll just live with it...
except if somebody has some insights on how to "catch" the 'End of
buffer' error and add some more protective programming around the
'scroll-up' function ?

=2Ds

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAk4BkK8ACgkQPj4AVbsZCCbMgQCfaHUPwQtbjZfulXpuD1NUiZSp
oiMAoMVAiypIWE5bjDc7Ew0K5lLR6B0K
=A9zy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--