Return-Path: <tomi.ollila@iki.fi>
X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12218431FB6
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 21:56:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none]
	autolearn=disabled
Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id pbn-sAaZidiK for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
	Mon, 16 Apr 2012 21:56:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from guru.guru-group.fi (guru-group.fi [87.108.86.66])
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07B98431FAE
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 21:56:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by guru.guru-group.fi (Postfix, from userid 501)
	id C787868055; Tue, 17 Apr 2012 07:56:47 +0300 (EEST)
From: Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi>
To: Justus Winter <4winter@informatik.uni-hamburg.de>,
	Patrick Totzke <patricktotzke@googlemail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Split notmuch_database_close into two functions
In-Reply-To: <20120416214554.15615.86242@thinkbox.jade-hamburg.de>
References:
 <1332291311-28954-1-git-send-email-4winter@informatik.uni-hamburg.de>
	<20120401032323.GH5949@mit.edu>
	<20120412090533.2074.78211@thinkbox.jade-hamburg.de>
	<20120412165744.GF13549@mit.edu>	<20120413083358.13321.66680@megatron>
	<20120416214554.15615.86242@thinkbox.jade-hamburg.de>
User-Agent: Notmuch/0.12+113~gde05574 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1
	(x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
X-Face: HhBM'cA~<r"^Xv\KRN0P{vn'Y"Kd;zg_y3S[4)KSN~s?O\"QPoL
	$[Xv_BD:i/F$WiEWax}R(MPS`^UaptOGD`*/=@\1lKoVa9tnrg0TW?"r7aRtgk[F
	!)g;OY^,BjTbr)Np:%c_o'jj,Z
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 07:56:47 +0300
Message-ID: <m24nsjufao.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: notmuch mailing list <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
	<notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 04:56:57 -0000

On Tue, Apr 17 2012, Justus Winter <4winter@informatik.uni-hamburg.de> wrote:

> Hi everyone,
>
> Quoting Patrick Totzke (2012-04-13 10:33:58)
>> Quoting Austin Clements (2012-04-01 04:23:23)
>> >Maybe you could describe your use case in more detail?
>> 
>> Quoting Austin Clements (2012-04-12 17:57:44)
>> >Quoth Justus Winter on Apr 12 at 11:05 am:
>> ...
>> >I see.  TL;DR
>> 
>> .. which should pretty much settle Austins opinion on
>> libnotmuch users being second class citizens.
>
> Na, I think you misinterpreted Austin here, I think he summarized his
> position. Looking back at my mail I think I came across a lot harsher
> than necessary, I'm sorry for that. Let's get back to the issue at
> hand, shall we?
>
> Both Austin and Mark seem to support the split, any other opinions?

I support it too (as did earlyer). Do we already have pushable series
or is there a need for a new one ? It would be good to have this done
so that application writers can start relying this being available
in "official" notmuch (in 0.13 -- SONAME updated -- any other patches
pending requiring SONAME bump to be reviewed ?).

>
> Cheers,
> Justus

Tomi