Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F7E56DE0948 for ; Sat, 13 Jun 2015 22:45:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.193 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.193 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.193] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id i5pD5OoaSrut for ; Sat, 13 Jun 2015 22:44:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx.xen14.node3324.gplhost.com (gitolite.debian.net [87.98.215.224]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D93E6DE0350 for ; Sat, 13 Jun 2015 22:44:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from remotemail by mx.xen14.node3324.gplhost.com with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Z40hf-0002Td-RZ; Sun, 14 Jun 2015 05:43:31 +0000 Received: (nullmailer pid 10271 invoked by uid 1000); Sun, 14 Jun 2015 05:43:12 -0000 From: David Bremner To: Xu Wang , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: search query "replytoid:" In-Reply-To: References: <877fr79upd.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.20.1+21~g4e79903 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.4.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2015 07:43:12 +0200 Message-ID: <87y4jmyhe7.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2015 05:45:02 -0000 Xu Wang writes: > Dear David and Suvayu, > > Thank you for your ideas. My goal is to do something like the following: > notmuch search tag:reply-required and not tag:replied > > which was discussed here: > http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/2010/002558.html > This recent blog report looks related to your goal: https://tomasz.buchert.pl/blog/2015/06/14/notmuch-response/