Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD748431FB6 for ; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 21:55:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rI8+Slouokl0 for ; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 21:55:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.kapsi.fi (mail.kapsi.fi [217.30.184.167]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 04F3A431FAF for ; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 21:55:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dsl-jklbrasgw1-54fb12-136.dhcp.inet.fi ([84.251.18.136] helo=localhost) by mail.kapsi.fi with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1XP2al-0005cQ-2B; Wed, 03 Sep 2014 07:54:47 +0300 Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2014 07:54:39 +0300 From: Perttu Luukko To: Jani Nikula Subject: Re: How to debug 'ignoring non-mail file' issues Message-ID: <20140903045439.GA5022@rakuuna.dhcp.inet.fi> References: <20140831074059.GA13399@rakuuna.dhcp.inet.fi> <87tx4ssoux.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca> <20140901065220.GB3901@lakka.kapsi.fi> <20140901071526.GA13634@lakka.kapsi.fi> <87r3ztvjwn.fsf@nikula.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87r3ztvjwn.fsf@nikula.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22.1 (2013-10-16) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 84.251.18.136 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: perttu.luukko@iki.fi X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on mail.kapsi.fi); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 04:55:10 -0000 On 2014-09-02 23:37:12, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Mon, 01 Sep 2014, Perttu Luukko wrote: > > Yes, upgrading to GMime 2.6.20 caused all the messages on my server > > classified as mail. > > What was the old version? If it was 2.4 we should probably consider > dropping support for that in future notmuch. It was 2.4.33. It might still work for other people, I don't know. I still have some ignored mails. If I can nail down why they are ignored we might now more about why GMime 2.4 ignored even more mail. They were from around the same time period, so it might have something to do with the email setup I had at that time. > > Even more reason to give a separate warning for GMime parse errors. > > Not sure. We only get a binary success/fail from GMime, and that gets > printed for all non-email files. I'm not sure it's helpful. What I mean that there would be a separate error for cases "Does not resemble an email message at all", i.e., some control file your mail server happens to store in the mailbox, and "Looks like mail but we can't parse it", i.e., better find out why it can't be parsed to avoid potentially important messages going missing from the database. -- Perttu