Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1751B431FAF for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2014 03:22:14 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eeUDz5LKPw-y for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2014 03:22:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from yantan.tethera.net (yantan.tethera.net [199.188.72.155]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8EC07431FAE for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2014 03:22:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from remotemail by yantan.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WLsqp-00066F-6n; Fri, 07 Mar 2014 07:22:03 -0400 Received: (nullmailer pid 9225 invoked by uid 1000); Fri, 07 Mar 2014 11:21:58 -0000 From: David Bremner To: Jani Nikula , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] debian: add dependency on bash-completion In-Reply-To: <87wqg6svoh.fsf@zancas.localnet> References: <1394111097-30993-1-git-send-email-david@tethera.net> <878usn2b9g.fsf@nikula.org> <87wqg6svoh.fsf@zancas.localnet> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.17+106~g0421995 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2014 07:21:58 -0400 Message-ID: <87txbas17t.fsf@zancas.localnet> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2014 11:22:14 -0000 David Bremner writes: > Jani Nikula writes: >> >> Not that I know anything about Debian packaging, but should we require >> bash-completion >= 1.90 here too? (See the configure script.) > > debian stable is 2.0, but it wouldn't hurt. > > d pushed with the versioned build dep d