Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9AA2431FBC for ; Fri, 4 May 2012 04:19:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.799 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zbtrdb9ybQBF for ; Fri, 4 May 2012 04:19:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wi0-f179.google.com (mail-wi0-f179.google.com [209.85.212.179]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC811431FB6 for ; Fri, 4 May 2012 04:19:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by wibhn6 with SMTP id hn6so1031037wib.2 for ; Fri, 04 May 2012 04:19:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=YBRbLzLzu1CsOpeWYozy+BtGiOIQpfHL/keli/A0hiM=; b=c+TA0/PJ+cE8Y1shVGwMwNKwnNePFJkgf/AdeHd48JmCwNU6FVuJrNF/EyIQOEqksK 7zu4q5fpUQzgSGk6dJLXV6ch4gDuKXkhWh2eoH5YRmK8hDt3nMET3PGFcfAvQcyrLTcD /MTAyDqGG72bmnWhd3D+t9aTC4WUMeOn2e6ZsNKEC+IZeBvJ3BTUzbENYdNgxZg5pr/e dTTdSEKT9IEdWYnst/N9gr93sINYThyalBD5NzZHlru8PQySwNMOXekvn7NuTF4t3E3O 4asm3ygY6dq0+FdR9b1sAZVQXy810LjlGkQ3ryvkuVSVKPK+cqrrtcKeMYSVlPU2q7HX XaWw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.225.12 with SMTP id y12mr3610391wep.39.1336130353045; Fri, 04 May 2012 04:19:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.124.197 with HTTP; Fri, 4 May 2012 04:19:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20120502202340.4214.21470@daenerys.khirnov.net> References: <20120114075443.27927.39754@daenerys.khirnov.net> <20120502202340.4214.21470@daenerys.khirnov.net> Date: Fri, 4 May 2012 13:19:13 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFC] vim plugin rewrite II From: Felipe Contreras To: Anton Khirnov Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 May 2012 11:19:16 -0000 On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 10:23 PM, Anton Khirnov wrote: > sorry for the late reply, I see you already reached the same point as > me, except with ruby ;) Yay for competition. I think my plugin is a bit further. And yeah, competition is good, but also collaboration; hopefully the 3 plugins can share as much as possible. >> I was seriously considering to concentrate on this plugin instead of >> the current one, but I'm afraid every little error causes a crash, >> even when a subprocess fails (e.g. msmtp), so it's not really usable >> for me. Not to mention that it's really hard to debug, because every >> bug causes a crash, and sometimes I get random crashes with no >> information about what caused it at all. >> >> I am starting to work on a version that uses ruby, and it doesn't seem >> to have these issues, but lets see. I'm still not sure if we should >> depend on ruby/python bindings, maybe there's a way to make them >> optional. >> >> Anyway, if you find a way to improve the crash issues, let me know, so >> far it's the only real issue I see with this plug-in. > > That is weird, I'm not getting any crashes here. On any exception in the > python code it prints the backtrace and continues normally. I don't > think I've ever seen it actually crash (not counting my ultimately > unsuccessfull attempts at threading). I wonder what could cause this. Interesting. I would need to check that, but I don't have time right now =/ Cheers. -- Felipe Contreras