Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B0AD431FC0 for ; Wed, 24 Feb 2010 11:10:25 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.274 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.274 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1.8, AWL=1.125, BAYES_00=-2.599] autolearn=ham Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YotD2ZWDbBJW; Wed, 24 Feb 2010 11:10:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from yoom.home.cworth.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79511431FAE; Wed, 24 Feb 2010 11:10:24 -0800 (PST) Received: by yoom.home.cworth.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id CAA5A25427B; Wed, 24 Feb 2010 11:10:21 -0800 (PST) From: Carl Worth To: martin f krafft , Sebastian Spaeth In-Reply-To: <20100210222216.GR16186@lapse.rw.madduck.net> References: <87636u34lw.fsf@SSpaeth.de> <87d411zvz8.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> <20100125213231.GB15987@lapse.rw.madduck.net> <960df8f6a8a08f2ca3aceef5a216d691.squirrel@webmail.sspaeth.de> <87wrz4fqsw.fsf@lillypad.riseup.net> <20100127194149.GA23034@lapse.rw.madduck.net> <20100128070522.GA18649@ukfsn.org> <20100201223112.GA20288@lapse.rw.madduck.net> <20100210032503.GA19427@lapse.rw.madduck.net> <87aavhsaqq.fsf@SSpaeth.de> <20100210222216.GR16186@lapse.rw.madduck.net> Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 11:10:21 -0800 Message-ID: <87ocjewiua.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [notmuch] patchwork test instance X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 19:10:25 -0000 --=-=-= On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 11:22:16 +1300, martin f krafft wrote: > Carl, would you consider bouncing messages to addresses like > patchwork+rejected@patchwork.notmuchmail.org? That would make it > trivial for me to write glue to update patchwork automatically. Now you're talking my language, Martin! I'm disinclined to go to a web browser, find the right buttons and push them, but it's easy for me to add an extra address when declining a patch, (since I have to write that email message already and I can even just add a keybinding to add the extra address). -Carl --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFLhXmd6JDdNq8qSWgRAkidAJ91y96b3zEgG/PX6ABzAdwV8Vg4KwCePQUB ctVfNTcLSjmYzaMR1F4b2ZI= =PWoC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--