Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3E67431FD0 for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 17:33:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.01 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.01 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ziJ-ilcyMYF4 for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 17:33:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from arlo.cworth.org (arlo.cworth.org [50.43.72.2]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D617431FB6 for ; Mon, 16 May 2011 17:33:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from yoom.home.cworth.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25FB029A056; Mon, 16 May 2011 17:33:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by yoom.home.cworth.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 711F1254183; Mon, 16 May 2011 17:33:22 -0700 (PDT) From: Carl Worth To: Jameson Graef Rollins , Daniel Kahn Gillmor Subject: Re: MIME restructuring [was: Re: release-candidate/0.6] In-Reply-To: <87wrhq8e6a.fsf@servo.factory.finestructure.net> References: <8762pn7gth.fsf@servo.factory.finestructure.net> <874o4zczr8.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> <87wrhvyqfn.fsf@servo.factory.finestructure.net> <87r57ybcna.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> <4DD18DFE.7090206@fifthhorseman.net> <87ei3ybawo.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> <87wrhq8e6a.fsf@servo.factory.finestructure.net> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.5 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1 (i486-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 17:33:16 -0700 Message-ID: <87vcxa9neb.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Cc: Notmuch Mail X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 00:33:25 -0000 --=-=-= On Mon, 16 May 2011 15:37:49 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote: > See mml-secure-message-sign-pgpmime to sign an entire message, as > opposed to just a single part. Thanks! That's good to know. (Trying here.) > I think the two paths reconverge later in the series. Can you look > ahead a bit to see if that concern is addressed? Daniel did point me to later in the series where the numbers are at least the same in text and json output. I've grabbed that state for generating a test case, (also with Daniels test message). And I'm now cooking up a new commit that will pass that test but with less code duplication than the current patch. -Carl --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk3RwkwACgkQ6JDdNq8qSWisJACgiAdqDPBTeCbUHDXwpSHlXnFm qEgAn3XYmBjhB1n9Tm4qH6ddmqgUwtvJ =Kxdj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--