Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A99DC431FBD for ; Sat, 6 Feb 2010 14:25:46 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.437 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.437 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1.8, AWL=0.473, BAYES_05=-1.11] autolearn=ham Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id veowEedNvHOA; Sat, 6 Feb 2010 14:25:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from yoom.home.cworth.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CECB9431FAE; Sat, 6 Feb 2010 14:25:45 -0800 (PST) Received: by yoom.home.cworth.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 047A2254181; Sun, 7 Feb 2010 10:45:40 +1300 (NZDT) From: Carl Worth To: Michal Sojka , notmuch@notmuchmail.org In-Reply-To: <201002061140.18833.sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz> References: <123554aa0911200056h73def158pb0db64a2a78ed687@mail.gmail.com> <87vdgxqepm.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> <87d40jpkzj.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> <201002061140.18833.sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz> Date: Sat, 06 Feb 2010 13:45:32 -0800 Message-ID: <87ljf6ca2r.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Subject: Re: [notmuch] notmuch new: Memory problem (with uuencoded content) X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Feb 2010 22:25:46 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 6 Feb 2010 11:40:18 +0100, Michal Sojka wrote: > I've just looked at your notmuch-test commits. Did you noticed my patches= =20 > which port Git's test framework for use with notmuch? Hi Michal, Ah, my mistake! That's what I get for working through my backlog chronologically. ;-) > That framework has the=20 > same spirit as yours (shell scripting, easy to use) but compared to your= =20 > current test script it has some nice features: All of these features do sound very nice. > It is straightforward to convert your current test script to Git's framew= ork.=20 > If you are interested I'll do it. Yes, I'd be quite interested in seeing that. Thanks for your contributions, and sorry I missed (or haven't yet gotten to) the patch you sent earlier. =2DCarl --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFLbeL96JDdNq8qSWgRAsXJAJ90chn/9OwO9BBjN2PBbQ+ihnz+8gCdFOam Oizct5+5HXssjWSNlpBMj98= =jQbc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--