DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=sender:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id
	:mime-version:content-type;
	b=ilKFxdRdWmwLoSxZSlc3Mo4lFqPmNiaCW8W3RoB3F+MOkXKmX90bNBoBxxsNmvi8XP
	TMJMjtZcFsSe7jqvFdzRbl6TzcJQAmON+exTZdlYkLA4lAwYb5cG7U6mOEAE2tC87I/T
	DFV0n+8vpYx79OtKpaLhmWiiD5d47BAFlFMQ4=
Sender: Jed Brown <five9a2@gmail.com>
From: Jed Brown <jed@59A2.org>
To: Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org>, Michal Sojka <sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz>,
	notmuch@notmuchmail.org
In-Reply-To: <87ljf2md2d.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
References: <87mxzjpl9v.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
	<87eikvpfzl.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
	<87r5oua2wv.fsf@steelpick.localdomain>
	<87ljf2md2d.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2010 20:30:17 +0100
Message-ID: <87tytqqkae.fsf@59A2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Subject: Re: [notmuch] [PATCH] Switch from random to sequential thread
 identifiers.
Precedence: list

On Tue, 09 Feb 2010 11:19:54 -0800, Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org> wrote:
> I did verify the above in a copy of WG14/N1124. For anyone that doesn't
> recognize that, that's the draft from the C99 working group that I've
> been told is remarkably similar to C99 but distinct in that it's freely
> available[*]. I haven't verified the similarity, but I have found that
> document quite useful in cases like this one.

This one is more recent (TC3):

  http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/WG14/www/docs/n1256.pdf

I don't know the legality of this copy:

  http://www.ishiboo.com/~danny/c++/C_STANDARD-ISOIEC9899-1999.pdf


Jed