Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 989F7431FBF for ; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 08:38:25 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VsSZ6-XfDysU for ; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 08:38:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from keithp.com (home.keithp.com [63.227.221.253]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1557431FAE for ; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 08:38:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by keithp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E2DE76012A; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 08:38:24 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at keithp.com Received: from keithp.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (keithp.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id NXgMZUs7KZ9E; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 08:38:21 -0800 (PST) Received: by keithp.com (Postfix, from userid 1033) id 29B19B84011; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 08:38:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from keithp.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by keithp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AC8976012A; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 08:38:21 -0800 (PST) From: Keith Packard To: Jan Janak , Carl Worth In-Reply-To: References: <87639122sx.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> <87bpismx21.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 08:38:20 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [notmuch] notmuch 'index' mode. X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 16:38:25 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 13:14:07 +0100, Jan Janak wrote: > I like this. I think this is much cleaner than the "virtual tag" > approach. A disadvantage I see is that you would not see this 'virtual tags' in the list of tags on each message. And, we'd have to put the virtual tags in the .config file or the command line would become a lot less useful. Speaking of which, we should put the folders in the .config file in any case, and provide command line syntax to use them. =2D-=20 keith.packard@intel.com --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFLDAv8Qp8BWwlsTdMRAi49AJ9qZZmYBzYyaTFZEWAZhLDXiZqDqwCgq0sy 1fFzPCvhNhNilrJOIgV935o= =T+gQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--