Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1126431E82 for ; Sat, 25 Feb 2012 19:12:42 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7u2tKPXDNNkH for ; Sat, 25 Feb 2012 19:12:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from socrates.hocat.ca (socrates.hocat.ca [76.10.188.53]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3202431FD5 for ; Sat, 25 Feb 2012 19:12:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from hermes.hocat.ca (hermes.hocat.ca [69.165.170.253]) by socrates.hocat.ca (Postfix) with SMTP id DE610155A4; Sat, 25 Feb 2012 10:44:07 -0700 (MST) Received: (nullmailer pid 21413 invoked by uid 1000); Sat, 25 Feb 2012 17:43:40 -0000 From: Tom Prince To: Mark Walters , Notmuch Mail Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] emacs: selection-menu.el In-Reply-To: <874nufx0qw.fsf@qmul.ac.uk> References: <1330009817-24148-1-git-send-email-tomi.ollila@iki.fi> <874nufx0qw.fsf@qmul.ac.uk> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.11+91~g871fc32 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.5 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2012 12:43:40 -0500 Message-ID: <87linqg65v.fsf@hermes.hocat.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 03:12:43 -0000 On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 23:36:23 +0000, Mark Walters wrote: > I have played with this and I like the feel of it: it is much more > informative than completing-read and much less cluttered than > ido-completing-read. I wonder if the completion method should be customizable, rather than forcing a particular one? There is at least, ido-mode, anything, icicles, as various completion methods availble for emacs, suggesting that it is a personal thing which method one prefers. Tom