Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05DBC4196F2 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 03:57:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UiuR5vEZb779 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 03:57:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wy0-f181.google.com (mail-wy0-f181.google.com [74.125.82.181]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F70C431FC1 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 03:57:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by wyj26 with SMTP id 26so603931wyj.26 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 03:57:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.90.145 with SMTP id e17mr4662851wef.106.1272279456317; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 03:57:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ut.hh.sledj.net (host83-217-165-81.dsl.vispa.com [83.217.165.81]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e82sm123622wej.16.2010.04.26.03.57.35 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 26 Apr 2010 03:57:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by ut.hh.sledj.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5E78B59413B; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 11:57:45 +0100 (BST) To: Carl Worth , Sebastian Spaeth , Notmuch development list Subject: Re: Unhandled Xapian exception In-Reply-To: <87bpd8or04.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> References: <87aasul8h7.fsf@SSpaeth.de> <87bpd8or04.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.2-191-g4256215 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.1.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) From: David Edmondson Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 11:57:45 +0100 Message-ID: <87bpd65vme.fsf@ut.hh.sledj.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 10:57:38 -0000 On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 07:38:03 -0700, Carl Worth wrote: > Otherwise, we might want to start supporting more clever handling of the > exception. For example, the high-level application might want to retry > an operation if it fails due to a DatabaseModified exception. This is what I would like to do (and thought that I was!) in notsync. dme. -- David Edmondson, http://dme.org