Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4AA7431FB6 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2011 11:58:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.3 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2nFzHFIVhKqQ for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2011 11:58:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from TX2EHSOBE002.bigfish.com (tx2ehsobe001.messaging.microsoft.com [65.55.88.11]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B93FB431FB5 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2011 11:58:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail99-tx2-R.bigfish.com (10.9.14.252) by TX2EHSOBE002.bigfish.com (10.9.40.22) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.8; Wed, 6 Apr 2011 18:58:31 +0000 Received: from mail99-tx2 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail99-tx2-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A32E07C0518 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2011 18:58:31 +0000 (UTC) X-SpamScore: -10 X-BigFish: VPS-10(zz14ffO4015Lzz1202hzz8275bhz32i637h668h736h839h62h) X-Spam-TCS-SCL: 1:0 X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: KIP:(null); UIP:(null); IPVD:NLI; H:ausb3twp02.amd.com; RD:none; EFVD:NLI Received: from mail99-tx2 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail99-tx2 (MessageSwitch) id 1302116311476727_31534; Wed, 6 Apr 2011 18:58:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from TX2EHSMHS040.bigfish.com (unknown [10.9.14.248]) by mail99-tx2.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7172E14804F for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2011 18:58:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ausb3twp02.amd.com (163.181.249.109) by TX2EHSMHS040.bigfish.com (10.9.99.140) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.8; Wed, 6 Apr 2011 18:58:31 +0000 X-WSS-ID: 0LJ8VDE-02-4GL-02 X-M-MSG: Received: from sausexedgep02.amd.com (sausexedgep02-ext.amd.com [163.181.249.73]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ausb3twp02.amd.com (Axway MailGate 3.8.1) with ESMTP id 2F544FCC031 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2011 13:58:25 -0500 (CDT) Received: from sausexhtp01.amd.com (163.181.3.165) by sausexedgep02.amd.com (163.181.36.59) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.106.1; Wed, 6 Apr 2011 13:58:49 -0500 Received: from optimon.amd.com (163.181.34.104) by sausexhtp01.amd.com (163.181.3.165) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.83.0; Wed, 6 Apr 2011 13:58:29 -0500 Received: from mhdc-ns01.amd.com (mhdc-ns01.amd.com [165.204.35.147]) by optimon.amd.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id p36IwS2B010248 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2011 13:58:28 -0500 Received: from testarossa.amd.com (testarossa.amd.com [165.204.147.44]) by mhdc-ns01.amd.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p36IwS0D029887 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2011 12:58:28 -0600 (MDT) Received: (from manderso@localhost) by testarossa.amd.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id p36IwQNJ019535; Wed, 6 Apr 2011 12:58:26 -0600 X-Authentication-Warning: testarossa.amd.com: manderso set sender to MarkR.Anderson@amd.com using -f From: Mark Anderson To: "notmuch@notmuchmail.org" Subject: Debugging strangeness in To: field User-Agent: Notmuch/0.5-82-geead238 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.1.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2011 12:58:25 -0600 Message-ID: <3wd7hb72omm.fsf@testarossa.amd.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-OriginatorOrg: amd.com X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2011 18:58:35 -0000 Hello all, Do you have any hints about how I could figure out why gmime doesn't like this To: list? To: One Big Happy , dist.Happy Group I added printouts to lib/index.cc just so I could try to figure out what was missing, and I see this: Email address list: One Big Happy , dist.Happy Email address: One Big Happy Email address: dist.Happy Why did it do that? I will try pulling a new gmime source to see if this is a fixed bug, but I don't know the RFC's well enough to know if there is any wrapping behavior that justifies gmime in considering the email list complete. Any hints are appreciated. Thanks, -Mark