Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06862431FBD for ; Sun, 13 Apr 2014 04:01:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id i1PwS95r5Uhy for ; Sun, 13 Apr 2014 04:01:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from guru.guru-group.fi (guru.guru-group.fi [46.183.73.34]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB123431FBC for ; Sun, 13 Apr 2014 04:01:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from guru.guru-group.fi (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by guru.guru-group.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id 361ED10008F; Sun, 13 Apr 2014 14:00:58 +0300 (EEST) From: Tomi Ollila To: David Bremner , Jameson Graef Rollins , Notmuch Mail Subject: Re: [PATCH] emacs: process crypto for reply only when specified In-Reply-To: <8761me3st5.fsf@zancas.localnet> References: <1396689486-19232-1-git-send-email-jani@nikula.org> <1396852814-10338-1-git-send-email-jrollins@finestructure.net> <8761me3st5.fsf@zancas.localnet> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.17+184~g85e3db6 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) X-Face: HhBM'cA~ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2014 11:01:14 -0000 On Sun, Apr 13 2014, David Bremner wrote: > Jameson Graef Rollins writes: > >> This is a tweak to patch "emacs: sign/encrypt replies to >> signed/encrypted messages" to only add mml crypto flags for replys >> when crypto processing has been activated. >> > > The (merged) patch seems straightforward and seems to work. I'll > probably push it tomorrow if nobody complains. Code looks OK. +1. I'm interested to see whether replies to signed emails work on this system where sign/(de|en)cryption just doesn't work (out of the box) :D > d Tomi