Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A18F6DE1A2F for ; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 18:40:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.622 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.622 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=2.229, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.55, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2P1u7_FK1_5N for ; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 18:40:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Greylist: delayed 713 seconds by postgrey-1.35 at arlo; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 18:40:24 PDT Received: from outgoing.csail.mit.edu (outgoing.csail.mit.edu [128.30.2.149]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C635C6DE1A2E for ; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 18:40:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [104.131.20.129] (helo=awakeningjr) by outgoing.csail.mit.edu with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1YkjSl-0008Qn-Ln; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 21:28:27 -0400 Received: from amthrax by awakeningjr with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1YkjSk-0007Bx-Sd; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 21:28:26 -0400 From: Austin Clements To: Ronny Chevalier , David Bremner Subject: Re: notmuch_thread_get_authors In-Reply-To: References: <87618qfk5l.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.19+38~g8fb1cbc (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.4.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 21:28:26 -0400 Message-ID: <87lhhlhryd.fsf@csail.mit.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 01:40:28 -0000 On Tue, 21 Apr 2015, Ronny Chevalier wrote: > On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 1:35 AM, David Bremner wrote: >> Ronny Chevalier writes: > Austin Clements wrote: >> And I think there's a fairly easy way to do it in C code that will >> also prevent library interface bloat: instead of introducing new >> library APIs to get at this information, just use the existing >> notmuch_thread_get_messages API and construct the matched and >> non-matched lists in the CLI. Doing it in the CLI wouldn't require >> the library to export yet another string list structure, which is >> always a huge pain (thanks C!), and wouldn't introduce more "helper" >> functions into the library API. > > I disagree with what Austin said. Because this does not solve the > issue at all (or I misunderstood). The issue is with the notmuch API, > if someone is using this library there no way it can parse properly > the authors. > In my case I am not using the CLI but the notmuch library, fixing this > in the CLI is just an hack, and it does not fix the issue for the > library users. My suggestion was in no way specific to the CLI. That was the context of the discussion at the time, but for the purposes of this discussion, the CLI is just another library user. You're completely right that there's no way to reliably parse the authors list returned by notmuch_thread_get_authors. So don't do that. Just use notmuch_thread_get_messages, walk the messages list, and build your own authors list. There's no need to introduce additional complexity and surface area into the library API for this specific use case (IMO, even notmuch_thread_get_authors shouldn't exist, but it's there for legacy reasons.) Then you can get author lists for matched, non-matched, matching a specific tag, just the to, just the from, counts of how many times each author appeared, whatever you want. > Furthermore, I do not see why providing a string list NULL-terminated > in C is a huge pain? See the notmuch_tags_* and notmuch_filesnames_* APIs. Those are just string lists. > Otherwise, I agree with Mark Walters comments on the patch. > > If no one is working to fix this at the moment, I can send a patch? > > Ronny