From: Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org>
To: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>
Subject: Re: MIME restructuring [was: Re: release-candidate/0.6]
In-Reply-To: <4DD18DFE.7090206@fifthhorseman.net>
References: <8762pn7gth.fsf@servo.factory.finestructure.net>
	<874o4zczr8.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
	<87wrhvyqfn.fsf@servo.factory.finestructure.net>
	<87r57ybcna.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
	<4DD18DFE.7090206@fifthhorseman.net>
User-Agent: Notmuch/0.5 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1
	(i486-pc-linux-gnu)
Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 13:59:51 -0700
Message-ID: <87liy6bbug.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
	micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Cc: Notmuch Mail <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
Precedence: list

--=-=-=
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, 16 May 2011 16:50:06 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.=
net> wrote:
> before, the output was a linearized version of the mime tree, in
> particular removing the multipart pieces and only enumerating the leaves
> in a depth-first walk of the tree.
>=20
> So a message like this:

[snip example of change]

Thanks, Daniel! That does make things much more clear.

So what I'd love to see from here is a commit with a description like
the above, and then a test case looking like your example.

From=20there, I'd next like a new version of the commit that gets the
intended behavior with less code duplication.

I'll work on each of the above unless someone beats me to any of it. Let
me know.

=2DCarl

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAk3RkEcACgkQ6JDdNq8qSWgEcACfWCh3Iv0fOZxeAodvR+pI0//H
80wAoJpu7S3Czajfylff0qsIOtkD7DS2
=PtGL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--