From: Rob Browning <rlb@defaultvalue.org>
To: Xavier Maillard <xma@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Difference between search and filter
References: <m2ochf2ibe.fsf@deb.maillard.im>
	<87bpdex6re.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
	<m2mxox1gai.fsf@kcals.maillard.im>
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2010 10:47:02 -0600
In-Reply-To: <m2mxox1gai.fsf@kcals.maillard.im> (Xavier Maillard's message of
	"Thu, 25 Nov 2010 18:09:25 +0100")
Message-ID: <877hg0doc9.fsf@raven.defaultvalue.org>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Precedence: list

Xavier Maillard <xma@gnu.org> writes:

> Yes and no ;) In fact I'd rather have 'f' does a 'f'orward of current
> thread/message rather than refine the current search.

We could also consider a prefix for less common commands.  For example,
I'm used to C-c C-f for forward, which I only use occasionally.

Though I'm also used to 'f' and 'F' for "followup" commands (as compared
to 'r' and 'R' for reply commands), so I'd have to get used to 'f' as
something else, regardless.

-- 
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4