Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D96734196F0 for ; Wed, 7 Apr 2010 09:44:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.89 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.89 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1, BAYES_00=-1.9, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id puxuw9dgb6f1; Wed, 7 Apr 2010 09:43:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from yoom.home.cworth.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC5F0431FC1; Wed, 7 Apr 2010 09:43:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by yoom.home.cworth.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8281025400D; Wed, 7 Apr 2010 09:43:59 -0700 (PDT) From: Carl Worth To: Xavier Maillard , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [notmuch] Debian package update ? In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2010 09:43:47 -0700 Message-ID: <8763436wn0.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2010 16:44:01 -0000 --=-=-= On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 08:12:51 +0200, Xavier Maillard wrote: > I feel like being far behind master with my current (official) > Debian package. Is there any chance to get a more recent one soon ? Hi Xavier, I did update the Debian packaging yesterday, and uploaded new packages. (The upload might take a while before it appears since it added new libnotmuch1 and libnotmuch-dev packages that will have to be approved.) It took me a while to get around to updating the Debian package because the new library meant reworking the package a bit, I wanted to do an actual tar-file release before a new package, etc. With all of that stuff implemented now, it should be a very quick process to update the packages in the future. So hopefully there won't be much skew going forward. -Carl --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFLvLZD6JDdNq8qSWgRAnaGAJ4oiIulzjRBs3oB12gQcEvbY5orXQCghnIu h0srfP7yHv+nAGgiZKSPNzw= =m68a -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--