Return-Path: <tomi.ollila@iki.fi>
X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B57D431FB6
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:57:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none]
	autolearn=disabled
Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id vj3E5wnFdugC for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
	Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:57:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from guru.guru-group.fi (guru-group.fi [87.108.86.66])
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1BF2431FAE
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:57:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: by guru.guru-group.fi (Postfix, from userid 501)
	id 5540468055; Fri, 10 Feb 2012 22:57:07 +0200 (EET)
From: Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi>
To: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>,
	Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>,
	Notmuch Mail <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Build-Depend on libgmime-2.6-dev | libgmime2.4-dev
In-Reply-To: <87lioaesmu.fsf@rocinante.cs.unb.ca>
References: <1328829620-28220-1-git-send-email-dkg@fifthhorseman.net>
	<87lioaesmu.fsf@rocinante.cs.unb.ca>
User-Agent: Notmuch/0.11.1+164~g6619341 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1
	(x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
X-Face: HhBM'cA~<r"^Xv\KRN0P{vn'Y"Kd;zg_y3S[4)KSN~s?O\"QPoL
	$[Xv_BD:i/F$WiEWax}R(MPS`^UaptOGD`*/=@\1lKoVa9tnrg0TW?"r7aRtgk[F
	!)g;OY^,BjTbr)Np:%c_o'jj,Z
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 22:57:07 +0200
Message-ID: <m2sjii5rvg.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
	<notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:57:11 -0000

On Fri, 10 Feb 2012 09:15:53 -0400, David Bremner <david@tethera.net> wrote:
> On Thu,  9 Feb 2012 18:20:20 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net> wrote:
> > libgmime-2.6-dev entered debian unstable today.  If 2.6 is available,
> > notmuch should build against 2.6 instead of 2.4, as 2.6 is the current
> > upstream stable version of libgmime.
> 
> Hi Daniel;
> 
> I'm not necessarily opposed to migrating to the Debian packages to gmime
> 2.6, but I'd like to point out that your patch is might be more decisive
> than intended, since the build daemons strip all but the first
> dependency. This will cause the build do fail if 2.6 is not
> available. For more discussion of this, see
> id:"20110920181701.GQ3245@codelibre.net" (debian-devel, Sept. 2011).

For the time being, should the order be:

- libgmime-2.4-dev,
+ libgmime-2.4-dev | libgmime-2.6-dev,

?

> 
> David

Tomi