Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF9BD431FD0 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 18:58:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.699 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id N11AFFwlAJDv for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 18:58:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-qy0-f174.google.com (mail-qy0-f174.google.com [209.85.216.174]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 37805431FB6 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 18:58:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by qyk7 with SMTP id 7so3222627qyk.5 for ; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 18:58:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=wJJhUG0A495MjgfrsmEzEvo8rvA49cq+I5IvmNjGx5Q=; b=thZv3WISlCjUnXrrGSTe87nDGivHKX62+W1qofzi650QCSKAl1rOw7aVP54PL+QOe4 1TdoS25UPd10dMiHYWM4jPqJOk8+YIF2zW4kEa9IEL/tJZqQeNAHUVw9YHZCA5hP0gOf M46r91hG3eMbLhvAdU+znNhAQ9kgdmLjQK8Bo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; b=NfCUkhukjcyJq2sV2ZtJWJKto/WqCy83gn6/KeB8Grk131kpKYHfnXoBlwUmf61BIK v6ZyvElA6Ojpsh/eoVDJITWA4iTiQsvonhtu2KNWxfHmW5/uzR3xKBo9fnN/guUxrgg2 DzWZOyDOu9pAXPWAoBxWO+2MAcIMpKRUAcWBs= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.114.200 with SMTP id f8mr1114004qcq.68.1307671121261; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 18:58:41 -0700 (PDT) Sender: amdragon@gmail.com Received: by 10.229.211.148 with HTTP; Thu, 9 Jun 2011 18:58:41 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1307561409-5646-1-git-send-email-jrollins@finestructure.net> References: <1307320169-29905-4-git-send-email-jrollins@finestructure.net> <1307561409-5646-1-git-send-email-jrollins@finestructure.net> Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 21:58:41 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: JTw3SS6OIsGhRJv9i-RveRbXjCM Message-ID: Subject: Re: tweaks for handling parts in reply From: Austin Clements To: Jameson Graef Rollins Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Notmuch Mail X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 01:58:44 -0000 It's too bad this requires lots of special-casing. I dug into mutt, hoping to find some simpler way to choose what to reply to, but all I found was a far more complicated collection of heuristics (see mutt_body_handler if you're interested). Should reply *ever* include a "Non-text part" message? It certainly doesn't help the receiver of the reply and presumably the sender will either notice that a part is missing if they care about it, or probably miss the Non-text part message anyway if they don't. On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 3:30 PM, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote: > This is a small set of tweaks to remove unneccessary "Non-text part:" > lines in reply, for parts that really don't need to be mentioned. > > This patch set is not really related to the series that it is being > sent in reply to, but it has been worked on top of the message/rfc822 > rework of the multipart test, so it's being sent in reply to that > message. > > jamie. > > _______________________________________________ > notmuch mailing list > notmuch@notmuchmail.org > http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch >