Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3121740DDF7 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2012 18:15:13 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.3 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id i9Oo1aZuMS4E for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2012 18:15:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from tempo.its.unb.ca (tempo.its.unb.ca [131.202.1.21]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 540944143BF for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2012 18:15:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from zancas.localnet (fctnnbsc36w-156034076032.pppoe-dynamic.High-Speed.nb.bellaliant.net [156.34.76.32]) (authenticated bits=0) by tempo.its.unb.ca (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q0F2F77v011435 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 14 Jan 2012 22:15:08 -0400 Received: from bremner by zancas.localnet with local (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1RmFch-0004Wx-4d; Sat, 14 Jan 2012 22:15:07 -0400 From: David Bremner To: anton@khirnov.net, notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [RFC] vim plugin rewrite II In-Reply-To: <20120114075443.27927.39754@daenerys.khirnov.net> References: <20120114075443.27927.39754@daenerys.khirnov.net> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.11+61~gbaa2c97 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2012 22:15:07 -0400 Message-ID: <87r4z1iudw.fsf@zancas.localnet> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2012 02:15:13 -0000 On Sat, 14 Jan 2012 08:54:43 +0100, anton@khirnov.net wrote: > > The advantages over current vim client are still the following: > * sending and displaying/saving attachments > * much better unicode support > * tag name and search commands completion > * proper representation of the thread structure > * easier to extend thanks to python's massive standard library > > Please comment. Hi Anton; I'm not a vim user, so I probably can't say anything very helpful, but it does sound like some nice improvements. Hopefully one of our vim front-end users can comment a bit more. One thing I wondered about is if your version is still completely synchronous, with the resulting problems dealing with large (say, more than 10000 messages) search results? All the best, David