Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 927C0431FC0 for ; Sat, 15 Dec 2012 02:20:57 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.1 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id h+tBQ0--ddxb for ; Sat, 15 Dec 2012 02:20:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from homiemail-a84.g.dreamhost.com (caiajhbdcbhh.dreamhost.com [208.97.132.177]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F40EA431FBF for ; Sat, 15 Dec 2012 02:20:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from homiemail-a84.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a84.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BBF91DE059; Sat, 15 Dec 2012 02:20:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=invergo.net; h=from:to :subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version: content-type; s=invergo.net; bh=543q9+MxK1ZUXM86zBf4sME8Rpo=; b= LOs2E87C1TWMSHSORYKHZXxwFFYx8ALSNwIKMDPdmpEdR/R3CQ7o60hn7L/EKGSR y2TETKQ36y4ZhQFWlIDQ6VJ2/ga9hmbPlFvyCVdUSFlz8xJPyUqDDxfrrPMZmDdg B+Z9yq2XaiPxj0Q7CcGDmUfUZu1pbbzCvBqQTcxsxW0= Received: from localhost (unknown [95.61.26.193]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: brandon@invergo.net) by homiemail-a84.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 680501DE00C; Sat, 15 Dec 2012 02:20:55 -0800 (PST) From: Brandon Invergo To: David Bremner , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: handling mail sent to a subscribed list In-Reply-To: <87ehis5unf.fsf@convex-new.cs.unb.ca> References: <87txruqg8y.fsf@invergo.net> <87ehis5unf.fsf@convex-new.cs.unb.ca> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.14 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.2.1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 11:20:54 +0100 Message-ID: <87liczlipl.fsf@invergo.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 16 Dec 2012 16:55:39 -0800 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 10:20:57 -0000 > If understand correctly, your concern is with the second copy of a > message with the same message-id not showing up in your inbox? If so, this is > more or less a feature (although in the case where the duplicated > message id's are because of malice or stupidity on the sender's part, > and not duplicated messages, it is also a known bug). > > On the command line you can try "notmuch search --output=files id:foo" > where id:foo is copied via "c i" in the emacs interface. > > Or maybe I misunderstand your problem completely. Thanks for the reply. Yes I think you summed it up; I figured that it was behaving properly. In short it's that I have the email that I sent sitting wherever it was Fcc'ed and then shortly thereafter I receive from the email list a message with the same ID. Since the Fcc'ed one was already added to the database, the one that I received from the list just sits there. But I guess others using mailing lists have encountered this too, so I was asking how they handle it since I haven't figured it out yet. I'll give that command a try to see if I can put it to good use somehow. Regards, -brandon