Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A5C6431FAF for ; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 13:49:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vKkiQ5k7j7cH for ; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 13:49:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from che.mayfirst.org (che.mayfirst.org [209.234.253.108]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBF62431FAE for ; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 13:49:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.23.207] (dsl254-070-154.nyc1.dsl.speakeasy.net [216.254.70.154]) by che.mayfirst.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 71165F970 for ; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 16:49:48 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4F61046C.20309@fifthhorseman.net> Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 16:49:48 -0400 From: Daniel Kahn Gillmor User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:9.0) Gecko/20120125 Icedove/9.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: notmuch Subject: Re: anecdotical evidence: number mbox files in my maildirs References: <87k42stuno.fsf@zancas.localnet> <20120314214538.GA17254@joerg.workgroup> In-Reply-To: <20120314214538.GA17254@joerg.workgroup> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 20:49:52 -0000 On 03/14/2012 05:45 PM, Gregor Zattler wrote: > Hi David, notmuch developers, > * David Bremner [10. Mar. 2012]: >> We had a somewhat lively debate about desirablity of the following >> patch. My decision is that for now, we avoid changing the behaviour of >> notmuch, and do apply the patch. We can discuss later deprecating or >> changing this permissive behaviour. >> >> id:"1331385931-1610-1-git-send-email-david@tethera.net" > > I'm in favour of this patch since I have more than 294 967 mbox > files with one email each in my maildir hierarchy. I guess it > has something to do with my procmail scripts. Perhaps this also > happens to other users. Fortunately, since the release of gmime 2.6.7, gmime is lenient enough to parse these files. So i don't think we need the patch, we just need to make sure we build against the appropriate version of gmime if using gmime 2.6. Regards, --dkg