Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7706B40D163 for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 00:08:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.99 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.99 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bXPZrvP4D0Y0 for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 00:08:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from homiemail-a21.g.dreamhost.com (caiajhbdcaib.dreamhost.com [208.97.132.81]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7B5A4196F2 for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 00:08:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from homiemail-a21.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a21.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37722300064 for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 00:08:28 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=SSpaeth.de; h=from:to:subject :date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; q=dns; s=sspaeth.de; b=Y1+z5yKtgYfmMTzms5/+48cLiN0IBGHhDvOg+DD4Yw+BzaezwQuUdCfM6X+Zs Pr+BcStjYQ51XXeAfq+PAuNv8z/cIb7mjLa0xSdD/nThvTbDsSQUzMmy9AKmYF7D mXnAoAEmoRx9Bc1/Yr2qtgiDakpjIdxbJw05aFNktuRoso= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=SSpaeth.de; h=from:to :subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s=sspaeth.de ; bh=LeYyx76dLvZA48IZhK0D/k9B26s=; b=Fulg9OymdSZLlmBsH1dHqDAbryI UOHUR0lH+Z1u8N/J+Lzp+QEqSJBOrpm1J7xYQ8vDKVllSkdydsnOI8Ag/v1vcOpy X1aa2TeTXWlcKwcY3dBLehNZtRC0Ziu5E4T/JmXx3zOlJh6ETFHBTTNE6NhvYnqL b5CJop0nXrCJYCcI= Received: from spaetzbook.sspaeth.de (unknown [84.55.209.24]) (Authenticated sender: fax@sspaeth.de) by homiemail-a21.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id CF506300059 for ; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 00:08:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by spaetzbook.sspaeth.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 26 Oct 2010 09:08:24 +0200 From: Sebastian Spaeth To: Notmuch developer list Subject: Possible to do more async? User-Agent: Notmuch/0.3.1-97-g3cc1335 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.1.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 09:08:17 +0200 Message-ID: <87k4l5whwe.fsf@SSpaeth.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 07:08:40 -0000 --=-=-= Pressing 'a' to archive a thread and advance to the next takes about 2 seconds. This is annoying when I am just scanning my spam-infested mail account. Would emacs provide the possibility to first advance to the next thread and tag the old thread asynchronously? tagging could happen asynchronously anyway in most situations for better interactivity? Are others happy with the reaction times in the emacs interface? Sebastian P.S. And *somebody* please remove the notmuch-inserted BCC when replying. It is a)inconsistent with new mails via C-mx anyway, and b) could be inserted by the emacs UI for those who want it. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkzGfmEACgkQVYX1jMgnoGLCdACfRbU8hKQvL7IwlEFt3xLlEwZ0 HpkAn3fMu/c/BUMocfCteFC0aVLUjQc7 =IuWy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--