Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C0276DE140C for ; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 01:26:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.264 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.264 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.132, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.652, URIBL_SBL=0.644, URIBL_SBL_A=0.1] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kfWMDgWf5Bgw for ; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 01:26:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from guru.guru-group.fi (guru.guru-group.fi [46.183.73.34]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0601D6DE140B for ; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 01:26:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from guru.guru-group.fi (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by guru.guru-group.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5124100046; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 11:25:51 +0300 (EEST) From: Tomi Ollila To: David Bremner , David Bremner Subject: Re: test suite: add more debugging output for notmuch-new In-Reply-To: <1438670914-17203-1-git-send-email-david@tethera.net> References: <1438670914-17203-1-git-send-email-david@tethera.net> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.20.2+42~gbf3bfb8 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) X-Face: HhBM'cA~ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2015 08:26:03 -0000 On Tue, Aug 04 2015, David Bremner wrote: > The first patch in the series is a trivial cleanup. > > I _thought_ (and tricked Tomi ;)) that the next one was trivial too, > but now I'm not so sure. > > First, I forgot to update one test, but I mostly understand (or can at > least rationalize) that output. Then I had the bright idea that I > should add debugging output to other tests in T050-new. In 5 cases I > can't really understand the results. It seems like it takes several > runs of notmuch-new to remove directory entries. Maybe this is > intended, but I couldn't figure that out in a quick look. I got the same test results -- and could not figure out the reason through a brief look at the notmuch-new.c code. +1 for the series for now, hopefully we soon find out the resolution to the known broken tests. Tomi