Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDA85431FCB for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2013 17:26:10 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VESTPN8PMeT5 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2013 17:26:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from tesseract.cs.unb.ca (tesseract.cs.unb.ca [131.202.240.238]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 217FC431FD2 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2013 17:26:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from fctnnbsc30w-156034082078.dhcp-dynamic.fibreop.nb.bellaliant.net ([156.34.82.78] helo=zancas.localnet) by tesseract.cs.unb.ca with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Txp6G-0004vv-PW; Tue, 22 Jan 2013 21:26:07 -0400 Received: from bremner by zancas.localnet with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Txp6B-0007uw-5v; Tue, 22 Jan 2013 21:25:55 -0400 From: David Bremner To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: update top level argument handling In-Reply-To: <87ip6q33ya.fsf@nikula.org> References: <1358619958-21209-1-git-send-email-david@tethera.net> <87ip6q33ya.fsf@nikula.org> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.15 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.2.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 21:25:55 -0400 Message-ID: <87sj5sadwc.fsf@zancas.localnet> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam_bar: - X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 01:26:11 -0000 Jani Nikula writes: > > Patches 1-4 look good, and IMO should be used regardless of the > bikeshedding result on patches 5-7. I pushed the first 4. 6 and 7 will need rebasing if 5 is omitted, which seems to be the plan. d