Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8585431FB6 for ; Fri, 6 Apr 2012 08:38:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.401 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.401 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FREEMAIL_REPLY=2.499, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=1.2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AxxN-3h5Rfj6 for ; Fri, 6 Apr 2012 08:38:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.qmul.ac.uk (mail2.qmul.ac.uk [138.37.6.6]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 270E3431FAE for ; Fri, 6 Apr 2012 08:38:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.qmul.ac.uk ([138.37.6.40]) by mail2.qmul.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SGBEo-0001sI-Pj; Fri, 06 Apr 2012 16:38:11 +0100 Received: from 94-192-233-223.zone6.bethere.co.uk ([94.192.233.223] helo=localhost) by smtp.qmul.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SGBEo-0000iY-FH; Fri, 06 Apr 2012 16:38:10 +0100 From: Mark Walters To: Jameson Graef Rollins , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] Move --no-exclude to --exclude=(true|false|flag) In-Reply-To: <87bon47v0o.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> References: <1333716551-29153-1-git-send-email-markwalters1009@gmail.com> <87bon47v0o.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.12+96~g8f5ec3b (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2012 16:38:20 +0100 Message-ID: <87ty0w50r7.fsf@qmul.ac.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Sender-Host-Address: 94.192.233.223 X-QM-SPAM-Info: Sender has good ham record. :) X-QM-Body-MD5: 1e624825d6275d7cbb637cd4d1746cd9 (of first 20000 bytes) X-SpamAssassin-Score: -1.2 X-SpamAssassin-SpamBar: - X-SpamAssassin-Report: The QM spam filters have analysed this message to determine if it is spam. We require at least 5.0 points to mark a message as spam. This message scored -1.2 points. Summary of the scoring: * -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, * medium trust * [138.37.6.40 listed in list.dnswl.org] * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider * (markwalters1009[at]gmail.com) * -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay * domain * 1.0 FREEMAIL_REPLY From and body contain different freemails * 0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list X-QM-Scan-Virus: ClamAV says the message is clean X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2012 15:38:18 -0000 On Fri, 06 Apr 2012, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote: > On Fri, Apr 06 2012, Mark Walters wrote: >> This is the latest version of the patch series (previous version at [1]). >> I think this version fixes all the problems raised by Austin in his review. > > Tested and reviewed and LGTM. > > Unfortunately, though, I just now noticed that the tests don't cover > count and show excludes. Since everything else looks good, let's just > make a new version of [0]. I suggest we name the new test script just > "excludes" and then add count and show tests there. That should be > pretty straightforward. There are some exclude tests for count in test/count. Do you think it needs to be a full test everything like in test/search-exclude? There aren't any tests for show exclude, but there aren't very many tests explicitly for show anyway. My preference would be to add something like id:"1332171061-27983-1-git-send-email-markwalters1009@gmail.com" and add some tests to that. I could add some tests for show-excludes in the same format as the search-exclude tests though if you think that is better. Best wishes Mark > > Thanks again, Mark. > > jamie. > > [0] id:"1333716551-29153-5-git-send-email-markwalters1009@gmail.com"