Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B6CB431FBD for ; Sat, 19 Jul 2014 05:34:46 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6fRu+FrtuUms for ; Sat, 19 Jul 2014 05:34:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from yantan.tethera.net (yantan.tethera.net [199.188.72.155]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B4E69431FB6 for ; Sat, 19 Jul 2014 05:34:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from remotemail by yantan.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1X8TqV-00063M-Ai; Sat, 19 Jul 2014 09:34:35 -0300 Received: (nullmailer pid 18578 invoked by uid 1000); Sat, 19 Jul 2014 12:34:31 -0000 From: David Bremner To: "W. Trevor King" Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] nmbug: Handle missing @upstream in is_unmerged In-Reply-To: <20140716230347.GQ30232@odin> References: <87bnsp7wyt.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca> <20140716230347.GQ30232@odin> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.18.1+45~gf47eeac (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2014 09:34:31 -0300 Message-ID: <87pph15xyg.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2014 12:34:46 -0000 "W. Trevor King" writes: > On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 07:36:10PM -0300, David Bremner wrote: >> W. Trevor King writes: >> > If we don't have an upstream, there is nothing to merge, so >> > nothing is unmerged. This avoids errors like: >> >> pushed this one patch. > > Without the stderr-catching of something like patch 3, this means > folks without an upstream are going to see a distracting: > > error: No upstream configured for branch 'master' > On reflection, I don't think that patch made things worse for this use case. So I don't think it really hurts to leave it there for now. d