Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61AF4431FAF for ; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 19:08:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.7 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DCj6GzJQ0C4H for ; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 19:08:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dmz-mailsec-scanner-5.mit.edu (DMZ-MAILSEC-SCANNER-5.MIT.EDU [18.7.68.34]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C55EE431FAE for ; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 19:08:34 -0700 (PDT) X-AuditID: 12074422-b7fd66d0000008f9-2d-4f73c422d9f5 Received: from mailhub-auth-2.mit.edu ( [18.7.62.36]) by dmz-mailsec-scanner-5.mit.edu (Symantec Messaging Gateway) with SMTP id 01.B8.02297.224C37F4; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 22:08:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (OUTGOING-AUTH.MIT.EDU [18.7.22.103]) by mailhub-auth-2.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.9.2) with ESMTP id q2T28XbQ013096; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 22:08:34 -0400 Received: from awakening.csail.mit.edu (awakening.csail.mit.edu [18.26.4.91]) (authenticated bits=0) (User authenticated as amdragon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.13.6/8.12.4) with ESMTP id q2T28VYo002161 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 28 Mar 2012 22:08:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: from amthrax by awakening.csail.mit.edu with local (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SD4mt-0006LK-Cp; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 22:08:31 -0400 Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 22:08:31 -0400 From: Austin Clements To: Jameson Graef Rollins Subject: Re: [PATCH] emacs: Fix mis-named argument to notmuch-get-bodypart-internal Message-ID: <20120329020831.GZ2670@mit.edu> References: <1332812426-26684-1-git-send-email-amdragon@mit.edu> <87ty18kwmd.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87ty18kwmd.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFupmleLIzCtJLcpLzFFi42IRYrdT0VU6UuxvsOOnoMWefV4W12/OZHZg 8rh7msvj2apbzAFMUVw2Kak5mWWpRfp2CVwZR09tYC+Yy14xZ6pSA+MN1i5GTg4JAROJ/y+a 2SFsMYkL99azdTFycQgJ7GOUuHvwCCOEs4FRYv+eDqjMSSaJC9u/MYK0CAksYZTYMtO1i5GD g0VAVeLNbQWQMJuAhsS2/cvBSkQEzCR6vvwBs5kFpCW+/W5mArGFBUIlnkx/wwJi8wpoS5x+ vxZqZLbEupYFrBBxQYmTM5+wQPRqSdz495IJZBXInOX/OEDCnAKmEtOWdIGNFBVQkZhychvb BEahWUi6ZyHpnoXQvYCReRWjbEpulW5uYmZOcWqybnFyYl5eapGuqV5uZoleakrpJkZwOLso 7WD8eVDpEKMAB6MSD+8pzWJ/IdbEsuLK3EOMkhxMSqK88w4DhfiS8lMqMxKLM+KLSnNSiw8x SnAwK4nw+u0GyvGmJFZWpRblw6SkOViUxHnVtd75CQmkJ5akZqemFqQWwWRlODiUJHhXgAwV LEpNT61Iy8wpQUgzcXCCDOcBGr4PpIa3uCAxtzgzHSJ/ilGXY927K5cZhVjy8vNSpcR5O0CK BECKMkrz4ObA0tArRnGgt4R5J4BU8QBTGNykV0BLmICWLDmSD7KkJBEhJdXAmH7njEbALv9K 1eJvdV6tGTK7F6lNND4SavyjrnljdTW/SZXA4YUBfqeNjvddkux78E7wwWwdTcv7N/Q/RNTP OtcnFcCyTuaDTOCiEKYdbmsbdIxqBDW1y8uknGbZKpvMXZj1VuDXyhAn/0LTe93zFud+9thq +evXC/PXGVwbJOdLTnvmdqpNiaU4I9FQi7moOBEA9at6DR4DAAA= Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 02:08:35 -0000 Quoth Jameson Graef Rollins on Mar 28 at 6:46 pm: > On Mon, Mar 26 2012, Austin Clements wrote: > > Previously, this function took an argument called "message-id", even > > though it was a general query, rather than a message ID. This changes > > it to "query". > > I'm sure the argument was named such because: the function is retrieving > a message part so the query has to match just a single message, and it's > only ever given a message id by anything that calls it. And it's an > unexposed internal function. All of this to say that I think it doesn't > really matter that the argument was named as it was. All true. But there's a difference between a message ID and an id: query and the argument name threw me off for a moment when I was writing the id: query quoting patch. It could be `id-query', I suppose, but really it could be any query that matches a single message.