From: Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net>
To: Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org,
 jani@nikula.org,	david@tethera.net
Subject: Re: [DRAFT PATCH] modified notmuch-emacs-mua
In-Reply-To: <1405026779-29966-1-git-send-email-tomi.ollila@iki.fi>
References: <1405026779-29966-1-git-send-email-tomi.ollila@iki.fi>
User-Agent: Notmuch/0.18.1+130~g87e77ba (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1
	(x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2014 12:25:46 -0800
Message-ID: <871tpkvxo5.fsf@servo.finestructure.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
	micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Precedence: list

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain

On Thu, Jul 10 2014, Tomi Ollila <tomi.ollila@iki.fi> wrote:
> Highlights:
>
> * notmuch-emacs-mua without arguments runs (notmuch-hello)
>
> * runs emacs(1) in case emacsclient(1) fails to connect to running emacs
>
> * takes -nw option
>
> * handles mailto:
>
> * --from option when sending non-mailto: way
>
> * -i includes file --body[= ]string inserts string

Hi, Tomi.  I think including an emacs CLI like this is probably a good
idea.  I might not use it myself, since I've already concocted one for
my personal use, but I still think it's a good idea.

The particular thing I'm interested in, though, is mailto: URL handling:

> +	mailto:*)
> +	    oIFS=$IFS; IFS=; OPTARG="$*" IFS=$oIFS
> +	    escape_optarg
> +	    exec_mua "(progn (require 'notmuch) (browse-url-mail \"$OPTARG\"))"
> +	    exit
> +    esac

I have submitted multiple revisions of a patch that handles mailto: URLs
in notmuch-mua.el:

id:1334438868-17168-1-git-send-email-jrollins@finestructure.net

It hasn't been accepted yet, though.  I've tried browse-url-mail before,
and it would be convenient to use it.  However, used on it's own it has
the problem that it doesn't open new message buffer in the "notmuch"
way.  For instance, I prefer my new notmuch buffers to appear in new
frames.  browse-url-mail doesn't respect this.  Maybe it could be
wrapped in a notmuch-mua-mailto function, or you could instead be using
the function I submitted?

I've been a bit out of touch for a while, so forgive me if anything has
change that I'm not aware of.

jamie.

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=UTfn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--