Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F0B5429E54 for ; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 14:20:24 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.799 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aJ3ZYGYVYLus for ; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 14:20:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-bk0-f53.google.com (mail-bk0-f53.google.com [209.85.214.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F4AE429E21 for ; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 14:20:22 -0800 (PST) Received: by bkbzt19 with SMTP id zt19so1767358bkb.26 for ; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 14:20:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date:message-id :mime-version:content-type; bh=CtdXM295juD2zpIilokhlqAKmC4cw1xOvHAAizYMWA8=; b=enD4I/W41pUGsOoByefxpsNcueAnQtG9lsiSAf+6fwTlui9GUb0SN38PmnUFLBaR2C sVdJfgBSdk9wLAe7BQJJ0Bi3UdStgKTrye7hWwCSNQr5iVO14e5w7r7XhqE05EC46BLW rfzzwLg0XGgQc3+CiMpw/c/CfErEY/rSQFyQg= Received: by 10.205.130.12 with SMTP id hk12mr3914742bkc.56.1327357221689; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 14:20:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([91.144.186.21]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id bw9sm9987275bkb.8.2012.01.23.14.20.19 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 23 Jan 2012 14:20:20 -0800 (PST) From: Dmitry Kurochkin To: Austin Clements , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] mime node: Record depth-first part numbers In-Reply-To: <1327285873-4713-2-git-send-email-amdragon@mit.edu> References: <1326918507-28033-1-git-send-email-amdragon@mit.edu> <1327285873-4713-1-git-send-email-amdragon@mit.edu> <1327285873-4713-2-git-send-email-amdragon@mit.edu> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.11+100~gd650abf (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 02:19:15 +0400 Message-ID: <8762g2njto.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 22:20:24 -0000 On Sun, 22 Jan 2012 21:31:11 -0500, Austin Clements wrote: > This makes the part numbers readily accessible to formatters. > Hierarchical part numbering would be a more natural and efficient fit > for MIME and may be the way to go in the future, but depth-first > numbering maintains compatibility with what we currently do. The patch looks good except for few minor comments below. I do not think that we need another review for the next patch version. > --- > mime-node.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- > notmuch-client.h | 14 +++++++++++++- > 2 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/mime-node.c b/mime-node.c > index 27077f7..025c537 100644 > --- a/mime-node.c > +++ b/mime-node.c > @@ -112,6 +112,10 @@ mime_node_open (const void *ctx, notmuch_message_t *message, > root->nchildren = 1; > root->ctx = mctx; > > + root->part_num = 0; > + root->next_child = 0; > + root->next_part_num = 1; > + For consistency, we should either initialize root->parent to NULL explicitly or remove part_num and next_child initialization. > *root_out = root; > return NOTMUCH_STATUS_SUCCESS; > > @@ -137,7 +141,7 @@ _signature_validity_free (GMimeSignatureValidity **proxy) > #endif > > static mime_node_t * > -_mime_node_create (const mime_node_t *parent, GMimeObject *part) > +_mime_node_create (mime_node_t *parent, GMimeObject *part) > { > mime_node_t *node = talloc_zero (parent, mime_node_t); > GError *err = NULL; > @@ -150,6 +154,8 @@ _mime_node_create (const mime_node_t *parent, GMimeObject *part) > talloc_free (node); > return NULL; > } > + node->parent = parent; > + node->part_num = node->next_part_num = -1; Same here: if we initialize next_child to zero explicitly in mime_node_open(), we should do it here as well. > > /* Deal with the different types of parts */ > if (GMIME_IS_PART (part)) { > @@ -267,9 +273,10 @@ _mime_node_create (const mime_node_t *parent, GMimeObject *part) > } > > mime_node_t * > -mime_node_child (const mime_node_t *parent, int child) > +mime_node_child (mime_node_t *parent, int child) > { > GMimeObject *sub; > + mime_node_t *node; > > if (!parent || child < 0 || child >= parent->nchildren) > return NULL; > @@ -287,7 +294,31 @@ mime_node_child (const mime_node_t *parent, int child) > INTERNAL_ERROR ("Unexpected GMimeObject type: %s", > g_type_name (G_OBJECT_TYPE (parent->part))); > } > - return _mime_node_create (parent, sub); > + node = _mime_node_create (parent, sub); > + > + if (child == parent->next_child && parent->next_part_num != -1) { > + /* We're traversing in depth-first order. Record the child's > + * depth-first numbering. */ > + node->part_num = parent->next_part_num; > + node->next_part_num = node->part_num + 1; > + > + /* Drop the const qualifier because these are internal fields > + * whose mutability doesn't affect the interface. */ The comment is no longer relevant, please remove. > + parent->next_child++; > + parent->next_part_num = -1; > + > + if (node->nchildren == 0) { > + /* We've reached a leaf, so find the parent that has more > + * children and set it up to number its next child. */ > + mime_node_t *it = node; > + while (it && it->next_child == it->nchildren) It seems that it should be initialized to node->parent, because node->next_child is always 0. Just curious, does "it" stands for "iterator"? I would prefer just "i" or "iter" :) > + it = it->parent; > + if (it) > + it->next_part_num = node->part_num + 1; > + } > + } Austin, I trust you that this code works :) Though I hope we will get to hierarchical part numbering one day and it would simplify this code. Regards, Dmitry > + > + return node; > } > > static mime_node_t * > diff --git a/notmuch-client.h b/notmuch-client.h > index 9c1d383..abfe5d3 100644 > --- a/notmuch-client.h > +++ b/notmuch-client.h > @@ -297,6 +297,13 @@ typedef struct mime_node { > /* The number of children of this part. */ > int nchildren; > > + /* The parent of this node or NULL if this is the root node. */ > + struct mime_node *parent; > + > + /* The depth-first part number of this child if the MIME tree is > + * being traversed in depth-first order, or -1 otherwise. */ > + int part_num; > + > /* True if decryption of this part was attempted. */ > notmuch_bool_t decrypt_attempted; > /* True if decryption of this part's child succeeded. In this > @@ -324,6 +331,11 @@ typedef struct mime_node { > /* Internal: For successfully decrypted multipart parts, the > * decrypted part to substitute for the second child. */ > GMimeObject *decrypted_child; > + > + /* Internal: The next child for depth-first traversal and the part > + * number to assign it (or -1 if unknown). */ > + int next_child; > + int next_part_num; > } mime_node_t; > > /* Construct a new MIME node pointing to the root message part of > @@ -356,7 +368,7 @@ mime_node_open (const void *ctx, notmuch_message_t *message, > * an error message on stderr). > */ > mime_node_t * > -mime_node_child (const mime_node_t *parent, int child); > +mime_node_child (mime_node_t *parent, int child); > > /* Return the nth child of node in a depth-first traversal. If n is > * 0, returns node itself. Returns NULL if there is no such part. */ > -- > 1.7.7.3 > > _______________________________________________ > notmuch mailing list > notmuch@notmuchmail.org > http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch