Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35B98414793 for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2012 15:56:55 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.7 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id b36w-eIPoaOS for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2012 15:56:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-qw0-f46.google.com (mail-qw0-f46.google.com [209.85.216.46]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9CBAA414772 for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2012 15:56:54 -0800 (PST) Received: by qats34 with SMTP id s34so852008qat.5 for ; Sun, 08 Jan 2012 15:56:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nickurak.ca; s=google-dkim; h=mime-version:sender:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=WYoGfzDSWIgORH2k2e8NTI/1FivR91n/IMrpbv74ab0=; b=DxfDoui73JE0gxVL0NM5f6ORDfljmOFWRXaXn32/QNiIRCkW+9XlXP0QtTMKPiiK2t Ot6IAF+t3o1izj1x0zbRArVsuSdYgBclCkvbDkUX5V0md5f1RrDES5v408n/VFEyKEBC gcXbJuHHvH46wWywwTzO0wjhu5lCt8S7aQaXw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.110.210 with SMTP id o18mr16817757qap.72.1326067013909; Sun, 08 Jan 2012 15:56:53 -0800 (PST) Sender: jeremy@nickurak.ca Received: by 10.229.40.149 with HTTP; Sun, 8 Jan 2012 15:56:53 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [68.148.28.35] In-Reply-To: <87pqetrcsk.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> References: <87pqetrcsk.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2012 16:56:53 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: flsrf0csYk6kmewvs2W4e1MAEGg Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] emacs: bind 'r' to reply-to-sender and 'R' to reply-to-all From: Jeremy Nickurak To: Jameson Graef Rollins Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2012 23:56:55 -0000 On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 16:32, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote: > That's a good point. =C2=A0I think that maybe people are wanting to prote= ct > against the accidental reply to all when you only mean to reply to the > sender. Certainly a worthy cause. All I'm saying is I make the mistake in the other direction more frequently ;)