Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26CB3431FD0 for ; Tue, 1 Nov 2011 16:23:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.29 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.29 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7yUZe41MaI8t for ; Tue, 1 Nov 2011 16:23:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tempo.its.unb.ca (tempo.its.unb.ca [131.202.1.21]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3D85431FB6 for ; Tue, 1 Nov 2011 16:23:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zancas.localnet (fctnnbsc36w-156034064058.pppoe-dynamic.High-Speed.nb.bellaliant.net [156.34.64.58]) (authenticated bits=0) by tempo.its.unb.ca (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id pA1NNBVc009628 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 1 Nov 2011 20:23:12 -0300 Received: from bremner by zancas.localnet with local (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1RLNfg-0006rB-JQ; Tue, 01 Nov 2011 20:23:08 -0300 From: David Bremner To: Jameson Graef Rollins , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: Patch review/application process In-Reply-To: <87ehxr4jom.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> References: <878vo8kdl2.fsf@gilead.invalid> <87hb2n7w82.fsf@zancas.localnet> <87sjm74z36.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> <87vcr3ehyg.fsf@convex-new.cs.unb.ca> <87ehxr4jom.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.9+26~g4e49596 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2011 20:22:58 -0300 Message-ID: <87ehxr77hp.fsf@zancas.localnet> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2011 23:23:17 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 01 Nov 2011 14:27:53 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote: > I'm not sure why this is needed, since it seems to me that the whole > argument for tagging entire threads is that the individual messages are > *not* distinguishable from the thread. The problem is that "notmuch search foo and not bar" will return all threads containing a message satisfying "foo" and a message satisfying=20 "not bar". This makes=20 notmuch search tag:notmuch::patch and not notmuch::pushed notmuch use. > Please do *not* remove the ::patch tag.=20=20 No, I don't suggest/intend to remove the ::patch tag, only a ::unresolved t= ag, since there seems to be no nice way to search for (not notmuch::resolved). > The addition of something > From a set of "resolution" tags (::pushed, ::applied, ::obsolete, > ::rejected, etc.) should indicate resolution of the issue. Here I think we agree. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iJwEAQECAAYFAk6wf1IACgkQTiiN/0Um85kmKwP/dU11NEkNjXjfOKasZXIA0Nd/ MJ27k/LeVXqLOz0WM1aMH8BeFKqd9duEoJMrdQ8CrnHdG0dEpZCkBCnUHdQH62w3 EKHtHkRg0vysIY1hBOybch/SazSMaAi35oc7nTJJala2+4s5yZWKWpzILxiBWyXR TfL+59kALvwraD3++LU= =rP/p -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--