Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64C5B431FBC for ; Fri, 5 Mar 2010 04:51:54 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.537 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.537 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.538, BAYES_50=0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hShZTWoU6Ia3 for ; Fri, 5 Mar 2010 04:51:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from homiemail-a17.g.dreamhost.com (caiajhbdccah.dreamhost.com [208.97.132.207]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF2E4431FAE for ; Fri, 5 Mar 2010 04:51:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from sspaeth.de (unknown [195.190.178.84]) by homiemail-a17.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 0A75E7A8063; Fri, 5 Mar 2010 04:51:39 -0800 (PST) Received: by sspaeth.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 05 Mar 2010 13:51:37 +0100 From: "Sebastian Spaeth" To: Michal Sojka , notmuch@notmuchmail.org In-Reply-To: <87hbow409h.fsf@steelpick.localdomain> References: <1267533462-15682-1-git-send-email-Sebastian@SSpaeth.de> <87hbow409h.fsf@steelpick.localdomain> Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2010 13:51:37 +0100 Message-ID: <871vfz9bja.fsf@SSpaeth.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: [notmuch] [PATCH] notmuch-reply: Use a shorter 'On, X Y wrote:' line X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2010 12:51:54 -0000 On 2010-03-04, Sebastian Spaeth wrote: > The second problem is that the value of from_addr doesn't (always?) > contain sender's addres. When I wanded to reply to this email with you > patch applied, I got: "On 2010-03-02, Michal Sojka wrote:". So I fixed > that in your patch and added removal of "" around name. Cool thanks. Yes, I noticed that my patch was deeply flawed, so I appreciate having it fixed. I am not proud of my C skills... :) Sebastian