Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC560431FB6 for ; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 13:02:54 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gnp0+ot9NlMb for ; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 13:02:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from tesseract.cs.unb.ca (tesseract.cs.unb.ca [131.202.240.238]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5284D431FAF for ; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 13:02:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from convex-new.cs.unb.ca ([131.202.245.35]) by tesseract.cs.unb.ca with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1UA5CG-0000dv-TG; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 17:02:53 -0400 Received: from bremner by convex-new.cs.unb.ca with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1UA5CB-0005ih-Ho; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 17:02:47 -0400 From: David Bremner To: Martin Owens , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: In-Reply-To: <1361825059.24401.3.camel@delen> References: <1361825059.24401.3.camel@delen> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.14+257~ge43e0af (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.2.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 17:02:47 -0400 Message-ID: <87ehg46r9k.fsf@convex-new.cs.unb.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam_bar: - X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 21:02:54 -0000 Martin Owens writes: > Looking at trunk it looks like this code was rewritten completely. > Should the packages be ignored and should trunk be used instead? Hi Martin; Probably somebody needs to poke the folks at Ubuntu to sync from Debian experimental again; the packages in experimental are very close to that in git. d