Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB828431FAF for ; Tue, 21 Feb 2012 12:30:20 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cBqMtKxc1V2O for ; Tue, 21 Feb 2012 12:30:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from tesseract.cs.unb.ca (tesseract.cs.unb.ca [131.202.240.238]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ADEDE431FAE for ; Tue, 21 Feb 2012 12:30:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from fctnnbsc30w-142166230117.dhcp-dynamic.fibreop.nb.bellaliant.net ([142.166.230.117] helo=zancas.localnet) by tesseract.cs.unb.ca with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RzwLi-00064r-Ib; Tue, 21 Feb 2012 16:30:15 -0400 Received: from bremner by zancas.localnet with local (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1RzwLd-0007Rz-8V; Tue, 21 Feb 2012 16:30:05 -0400 From: David Bremner To: Justus Winter <4winter@informatik.uni-hamburg.de>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: nomuch_addresses.py In-Reply-To: <20120221091509.8534.59492@thinkbox.jade-hamburg.de> References: <87r4xur3rv.fsf@plc.plecavalier.com> <87fweamenf.fsf@schoepe.localhost> <20120221091509.8534.59492@thinkbox.jade-hamburg.de> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.11.1+188~ga5674c2 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 16:30:05 -0400 Message-ID: <87mx8cylo2.fsf@zancas.localnet> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam_bar: - X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 20:30:20 -0000 On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 09:15:09 -0000, Justus Winter <4winter@informatik.uni-hamburg.de> wrote: > I do get the feeling that it is perceived as desirable not to require > any kind of notmuch bindings (David once said something similar about > nmbug). I think nmbug is a different case from an optional utility. And yes, I still think it is better not to need the python bindings installed (and working) in order to report a bug, or develop the core/cli. Of course it isn't the only factor, who knows what will happen in the future. d