Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73664429E25 for ; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 00:33:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.09 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.09 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ljd6RDmbOaa1 for ; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 00:33:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from homiemail-a12.g.dreamhost.com (caiajhbdccac.dreamhost.com [208.97.132.202]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1305431FD0 for ; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 00:33:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from homiemail-a12.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a12.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2084E714083; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 00:33:31 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=SSpaeth.de; h=from:to:subject :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version: content-type; q=dns; s=sspaeth.de; b=Nw++cV/t4mmKUbzkrca8o1jn8bY s8nRw132xGeDexSwlXTU96xoMWkYRADnxc0+JtCWjqcI+4F0OYPTt3LyKKILnyVs yNJwkGRcrRk6pFCUnef1uk+PgEl2Wa8YpW3UQvx5Wzl1ewdSWdGQte8PDCr9p2du KHntobKfHwrKS+oM= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=SSpaeth.de; h=from:to :subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version: content-type; s=sspaeth.de; bh=FUyIUTXMyRKNRhwc33YWUAPS9GE=; b=Z UD2B03ZZlw6Jobb+1dh5Ll0T8HDE4otx326/J4bQ0CG4jFHRPB7sHapGoN/x6p0u pJrL+0rlox29H2wCGKGAEavspg1LHzB8wZx7+zDmO9S8U2m9ndml5U2nxm6QIScV adOQ2Jx2NXO7/K5gpTTuPhKfiySONP85Ivc0OinGSs= Received: from spaetzbook.sspaeth.de (unknown [195.190.175.87]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: fax@sspaeth.de) by homiemail-a12.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8701071406B; Thu, 18 Aug 2011 00:33:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by spaetzbook.sspaeth.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 18 Aug 2011 09:33:27 +0200 From: Sebastian Spaeth To: Alex Botero-Lowry , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: gmail syncing sort of working In-Reply-To: References: User-Agent: Notmuch/0.7-19-gee4579a (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.2.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 09:33:26 +0200 Message-ID: <87y5yrp41l.fsf@SSpaeth.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 07:33:33 -0000 --=-=-= On Wed, 17 Aug 2011 19:31:36 -0700, Alex Botero-Lowry wrote: > p.s. I also ran into an issue with the notmuch python bindings where I had > to wrap every c_void_p in POINTER() or it would segfault for any method that > tried to use a pointer. Also the sed command that tries to build notmuch.sym > doesn't work on freebsd, i changed it to work, but i'm pretty sure it won't > work on linux anymore. :) I wonder if using ctags might actually work for > that. Can someone with experience on python's ctypes comment on that? I read the terse documentation and tutorial on ctypes, and it doesn't say that one shouldn't be able to use c_void_p as a pointer, and it doesn't really say how using POINTER could change things (it seems to create a new pointer type, but I fail to see why that should help?) That having said, if you provide a patch, I'll be applying it if it fixes things. Sebastian --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk5MwEcACgkQVYX1jMgnoGJI+gCdFeLf1BrsaGLcRG6cdFZwQzOC J2oAnjEf9LOXB7k6iOoYCH3S2GZREPmC =Yi1J -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--