Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 787E3431FBC for ; Tue, 2 Feb 2010 10:42:09 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.288 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.288 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.289, BAYES_50=0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wBmEobd15NN4 for ; Tue, 2 Feb 2010 10:42:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from samir.ibcsolutions.de (samir.ibcsolutions.de [78.47.90.66]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBDDE431FAE for ; Tue, 2 Feb 2010 10:42:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from g229071080.adsl.alicedsl.de ([92.229.71.80] helo=barf) by samir.ibcsolutions.de with esmtpa (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NcNiD-00056N-Lb; Tue, 02 Feb 2010 19:42:57 +0100 From: Arvid Picciani To: Jameson Rollins , notmuch@notmuchmail.org In-Reply-To: <873a1jebve.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> References: <201001291049.21048.sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz> <1265122868-12133-1-git-send-email-sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz> <87eil3ehjh.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> <4B686569.7030408@exys.org> <873a1jebve.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2010 19:42:00 +0100 Message-ID: <87zl3rv5s7.fsf@exys.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: [notmuch] [PATCHv2] Preserve folder information when indexing X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2010 18:42:09 -0000 It's all the dots fault. it works just fine with folders not beginning with . On Tue, 02 Feb 2010 13:22:29 -0500, Jameson Rollins wrote: > I'm going back to my original > suggestion, which was that the configuration should state tag that > should be added for messages in certain folders. well that would be almost what i want. My folders are autogenerated by a generic list filter, and i'd be to lazy to check regulary for new folders. But tags are the proper solution here imo.