Return-Path: <david@tethera.net>
X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FBE2431FCF
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 16 Mar 2015 04:36:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 2.438
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.438 tagged_above=-999 required=5
	tests=[DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL=2.438] autolearn=disabled
Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id q-4HJeHD9tJ4 for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
	Mon, 16 Mar 2015 04:36:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.xen14.node3324.gplhost.com (gitolite.debian.net
	[87.98.215.224])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E336431FB6
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Mon, 16 Mar 2015 04:36:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from remotemail by mx.xen14.node3324.gplhost.com with local (Exim
	4.80) (envelope-from <david@tethera.net>)
	id 1YXTJE-0000uv-PW; Mon, 16 Mar 2015 11:35:48 +0000
Received: (nullmailer pid 7965 invoked by uid 1000); Mon, 16 Mar 2015
	11:35:35 -0000
From: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>
To: Harlan Lieberman-Berg <hlieberman@setec.io>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Subject: Re: Proposal: List-Id
In-Reply-To: <87wq2huan3.fsf@setec.io>
References: <87wq2huan3.fsf@setec.io>
User-Agent: Notmuch/0.19+67~gdbe9924 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.4.1
	(x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 12:35:35 +0100
Message-ID: <878uex2n08.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
	<notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 11:36:43 -0000

Harlan Lieberman-Berg <hlieberman@setec.io> writes:
>
> The standard for identifying mailing lists seems to be List-Id, as per
> RFC 2919.  I can understand the desire to keep the number of headers
> included in the header block low, but I wonder if this might be a common
> enough use-case to suggest its inclusion.
>

I think the real blocker at this point is that some copies of a message
may have list-id header and some not. Currently we only index the first
copy of a message that arrives. Indexing all copies would probably be a
good step in any case, but e.g. handling deletion of files requires some
care in that case.

d