Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1AC04196F3 for ; Sat, 24 Apr 2010 12:01:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Lfd3lDMjytSg for ; Sat, 24 Apr 2010 12:01:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wy0-f181.google.com (mail-wy0-f181.google.com [74.125.82.181]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D17C3431FC1 for ; Sat, 24 Apr 2010 12:01:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by wyf23 with SMTP id 23so2112729wyf.26 for ; Sat, 24 Apr 2010 12:01:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.164.21 with SMTP id b21mr2227203wel.46.1272135677948; Sat, 24 Apr 2010 12:01:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ut.hh.sledj.net (host83-217-165-81.dsl.vispa.com [83.217.165.81]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id x1sm6146274wbx.13.2010.04.24.12.01.16 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 24 Apr 2010 12:01:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by ut.hh.sledj.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id CB938594135; Sat, 24 Apr 2010 20:01:20 +0100 (BST) To: Dirk Hohndel , Carl Worth , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: Wrapping up the 0.3 release In-Reply-To: References: <87ljcchnfc.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.2-20-g89ec2c1 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.1.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) From: David Edmondson Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2010 20:01:20 +0100 Message-ID: <87d3xod69r.fsf@ut.hh.sledj.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2010 19:01:20 -0000 On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 09:53:17 -0700, Dirk Hohndel wrote: > > * Reply is now splitting the window > > > > We're copying the original message into the new reply buffer, so > > what's the advantage of splitting here? > > I'll voice my "don't like" of this feature as well, I guess. This depends at least somewhat on the setting of `pop-up-windows'. Maybe we should: (let ((pop-up-windows nil)) ...) in the reply code? I think that notmuch window handling generally needs some consideration and improvement. > > Finally, any of the tweaks I suggested to notmuch-hello mode would be > > quite welcome. I might take a whack at some of these. Hopefully early next week for me. dme. -- David Edmondson, http://dme.org