From: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>
To: servilio <servilio@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: branchs and tags and merges oh my!
In-Reply-To:
 <CAPFwwQiVXwQRZ84L5hg5ONwTg1QdXLUytCCp8gKxnp=jfie6XA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <87y60hn0mg.fsf@zancas.localnet> <yun7h81brkn.fsf@aiko.keithp.com>
	<87tyb5mumf.fsf@zancas.localnet>
	<CAPFwwQhGy6a4Hes2-7r8B2J=eaE_+07p4FGoh5ds=Ws1_+5H5w@mail.gmail.com>
	<874o347fot.fsf@zancas.localnet>
	<CAPFwwQiVXwQRZ84L5hg5ONwTg1QdXLUytCCp8gKxnp=jfie6XA@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Notmuch/0.6 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1
	(x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2011 09:44:28 -0300
Message-ID: <87iprj5yab.fsf@zancas.localnet>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
	micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Precedence: list

--=-=-=
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, 3 Jul 2011 03:14:03 -0400, servilio <servilio@gmail.com> wrote:
>=20
> I think there is no need for tags on master, "make dist" should only
> be run on the "release" branch, right?
>=20

It isn't just about make dist (which I anyway thinks makes sense to run
on master to make snapshots). Every compilation from git gets a version
number from running git-describe.  So unless we want all developers to
have useless/annoying version numbers, we have to care about tags on
master.

d



--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

iJwEAQECAAYFAk4QZC0ACgkQTiiN/0Um85k6JgQAnpcyvR8t1nl+rgbXoU0lKMcu
H2BwHnqCDFCrbHtNmoUDAdytwVK9TiEGU4pjgZwjVqoa/kZf8FRKgXdWEA+ig2cH
2PwW7PBAFG3neZCBV2z3260IyOI9Urf/RJXvz+TP/N/NxUvdKxLGOmKm5wuRTazz
ttC/sCRQZCz6qp9bo8M=
=gE8c
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--