Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80DF06DE0AD1 for ; Mon, 8 Jun 2015 07:59:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.206 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.206 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.206] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id udKbvHPaPa05 for ; Mon, 8 Jun 2015 07:59:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx.xen14.node3324.gplhost.com (gitolite.debian.net [87.98.215.224]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 513766DE0AC7 for ; Mon, 8 Jun 2015 07:59:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from remotemail by mx.xen14.node3324.gplhost.com with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Z1yUu-0000WW-9r; Mon, 08 Jun 2015 14:57:56 +0000 Received: (nullmailer pid 9200 invoked by uid 1000); Mon, 08 Jun 2015 14:57:37 -0000 From: David Bremner To: Jani Nikula , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [RFC] lib: add support for date:..! to mean date:.. In-Reply-To: <1425732959-2282-1-git-send-email-jani@nikula.org> References: <1425732959-2282-1-git-send-email-jani@nikula.org> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.20+15~ga1b054b (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.4.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2015 16:57:37 +0200 Message-ID: <87k2vegsda.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2015 14:59:48 -0000 Jani Nikula writes: > Up to debate: > > 1) Is something like this useful at all as an intermediate step before > we can have support for date:? (This can be done with a future > version of Xapian, or with a custom query query parser.) > > 2) If yes, are there better alternatives to "!" as the end point? (Or > should the special case be the start point?) Also "@" and "same" have > been suggested. Examples: date:yesterday..! date:today..@ > date:@..monday date:january..same. > >From the comments I guess it just needs a small man page update. d