Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A760C431FAF for ; Sat, 4 Feb 2012 08:52:00 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.7 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 63V9EpJImOWl for ; Sat, 4 Feb 2012 08:52:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-bk0-f53.google.com (mail-bk0-f53.google.com [209.85.214.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 11AAA431FAE for ; Sat, 4 Feb 2012 08:51:59 -0800 (PST) Received: by bke11 with SMTP id 11so4365528bke.26 for ; Sat, 04 Feb 2012 08:51:58 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.145.82 with SMTP id c18mr5319245bkv.121.1328374318515; Sat, 04 Feb 2012 08:51:58 -0800 (PST) Sender: awg@xvx.ca Received: by 10.204.104.13 with HTTP; Sat, 4 Feb 2012 08:51:58 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [96.52.216.56] In-Reply-To: <87obtfi0wg.fsf@gmail.com> References: <1328315554-16085-1-git-send-email-awg+notmuch@xvx.ca> <87obtfi0wg.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2012 09:51:58 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: Y_Pw3Xm9_SUUXpSFOc10_DwkCRA Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Bug and potential fix: forwarded messages From: Adam Wolfe Gordon To: Dmitry Kurochkin Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2012 16:52:00 -0000 On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 23:10, Dmitry Kurochkin wrote: > Yep, creating buttons for regions at the beginning of message is fixed. > But I like the idea of not hiding the message if there is no text. > Though, I think we should create the button, just not hide the text > initially. > > This change would conflict with my fix, so we should probably wait until > it is applied before working on this. Yes, this sounds like a good idea. I'll wait until your fix is in before giving it more thought.